Brother's budget MFC-250C multifunction printer offers decent print quality and has low running costs.
- Cheap, relatively low running costs, good photo print quality
- No media card slots, scan quality could be improved
Don't expect the best print quality, but at this price the Brother MFC-250C multifunction printer is a decent option that handles basic tasks adequately.
Price$ 119.00 (AUD)
Brother's MFC-250C multifunction printer is cheap as chips and serves up decent quality photo prints. We would have liked it to print a bit faster, but this multifunction is still a good buy for those who only need the basics.
The Brother MFC-250C is the MFC-290C without the automatic document feeder and media card slots. You are left with a copier, printer, scanner and fax.
Direct printing is still available through a PictBridge-capable USB port, which can be connected to a compatible mobile phone or digital camera. Disappointingly, Brother hasn't included support for direct printing from a USB stick.
Most low-end printers and multifunctions use a combination colour ink cartridge, but the Brother MFC-250C uses separate inks connected to the print head through a capillary tube system. Page yields are fairly low, forcing you to head back to the shops soon after buying the printer, but at 27c per A4 page, running costs are low enough to justify the trip.
Many Brother multifunction printers are slow, so we weren't surprised that this is case with the MFC-250C. The MFC-250C manages to print the first page of draft colour and mono documents in a respectable 13.7sec. The printer achieves a reasonable 15.9 pages per minute for mono draft documents and 14.5ppm when printing colour documents. However, the results are often faint and unreadable. To achieve reasonable results you should use normal quality; you can expect an average speed of 3.2ppm. Standard 4x6in photos take 36.5sec to print, while A4 photos take 1min 36sec.
We found text to be crisp and readable, with no aberrations when printing at 12pt or 20pt. At 7pt, we noticed some slight feathering on text characters, though this is expected due to the multifunction's comparatively large ink droplet size of 1.5 picolitres; higher-end multifunctions like the Canon PIXMA MP980 use 1pl ink droplets. Colours are solid, though aren't as vivid as they could be and lack the accuracy required for professional documents. Nevertheless, the print quality will suffice for school work and small splashes of colour in documents.
Considering the Brother MFC-250C's cheap price, the quality of photo printing exceeded our expectations. Banding is not a problem and colours are attractive if slightly inaccurate. On close inspection there is a noticeable amount of grain and noise in photos, which affects gradients and darker colours. If photo print quality is a priority, then the HP Photosmart C5380 will prove more useful.
The Brother MFC-250C is good enough basic for document scanning. Photos lack fine detail and colour isn't accurate; scans also turn out overly light. There is no automatic document feeder.
The Brother MFC-250C multifunction printer doesn't particularly excel at any one task. However, it has a low price and is adequate at most tasks.
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Fetch TV Mighty review: Better than Foxtel
- 2 Fetch TV Mini review: Make your TV a smart TV
- 3 Parrot Mambo Drone review
- 4 Evapolar USB air conditioner review
- 5 Hisense Series 7 ULED 4K UHD TV review
Latest News Articles
- EC says LCD screen cartel is active globally
- Sharp to increase LCD panel production on higher demand
- Dick Smith report says Australians keen to switch to digital radio
- Samsung, Numonyx to develop PCM specifications
- Faster SD cards could reach devices next year
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: The new best Android phone
- TV buying guide: What to look for when buying a TV in 2016
- Best iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus plans: Optus vs Telstra vs Vodafone vs Virgin
- Which flagship TV is best? Sony 4K HDR Bravia 2016 versus LG 4K HDR OLED 2016
- 10 Blu-ray movies / Best looking Blu-ray movies
- CCInfrastructure Specialist :SCOMWA
- FTCRM Business Process AnalystVIC
- CCLead Technical Specialist VMwareVIC
- FTSystems SpecialistNSW
- CCFront End Developer - Mid LevelNSW
- CCSenior Digital DesignerNSW
- CCContract IT Assistant (PC LAN Support) 161114/ITA/411Asia
- FTTechnical Support OfficerWA
- CCContract Programmer (HTML5/Java/Oracle) 161031/P/551Asia
- CCSenior System EngineerACT
- CCCisco Voice ConsultantWA
- FTSecurity Consultant / SMENSW
- FTDigital StrategistACT
- CCData Warehousing /Business Intelligence DeveloperACT
- FTSoftware / Web Development ManagerNSW
- FTBusines Systems AnalystSA
- FTSoftware Developers | .Net 4.6WA
- CCDatacenter EngineerNSW
- CCFull Stack Developer - Be a part of the innovation programVIC
- CCNetwork Deployment SpecialistNSW
- CCWeb Content EditorQLD
- CCMiddleware SpecialistNSW
- CCSenior Siebel DeveloperACT
- FTMicrosoft Dynamics AX Functional Consultant Advanced Warehouse ManagementWA
- CCBusiness Analyst/Systems Analyst (DW/BI)ACT