ASUS L1N64-SLI WS
- Two CPU socket design means it will be able to handle up to eight CPU cores in the future, 12 SATA ports, Full-speed SLI graphics, Capable of running four graphics cards
- Only supports Socket-F Athlon 64 FX 7-series CPUs, Currently slower than an equivalent Intel quad-core platform
If you're in the market for a high-end quad-core configuration, the ASUS L1N64-SLI-WS is well worth a look. Even though the Athlon 64 FX-74 CPUs that run on this board are slower than Intel's high-end Core 2 Extreme QX6800, ASUS says the board will run AMD's set to be released Phenom CPUs, which give this board the potential to run up to eight CPUs cores.
Price$ 499.00 (AUD)
The ASUS L1N64-SLI WS is the first quad-core-capable motherboard that's available for AMD CPUs. It uses a dual-CPU socket design that can run two separate dual-core AMD Athlon 64 FX 7-series CPUs -- FX-70, FX-72 or FX-74.
It has four DDR2 memory slots and supports up to 8GB of memory. Furthermore, it's furnished with the best PCI Express (PCIe) and Serial ATA (SATA) options that we've seen to date: two PCIe x16 slots (for full-speed SLI), two PCIe x8 slots, one PCIe x1 slot and 12 SATA ports, using two NVIDIA controller chips. It's a board that's aimed at workstation users, but its SLI graphics configuration is well-suited to gamers and enthusiasts.
The L1N64-SLI-WS runs NVIDIA's nForce 680a chipset and its two CPU sockets make it scalable from two cores all the way up to eight with one caveat: it uses Socket-F CPU sockets, rather than AM2 CPU sockets. This means that it's not compatible with current AM2-based Athlon 64 X2 and Athlon 64 FX CPUs. Socket-F is similar to Intel's land grid array (LGA) socket design, which removes the pins from the CPU, leaving it with flat surface connections. The pins are located on the motherboard's CPU socket instead. This socket is also used for AMD's Opteron workstation and server CPU.
Using two AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 CPUs running at 3GHz, 1GB of DDR2 800MHz RAM, a 500GB Western Digital hard drive, an ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT graphics card and Windows Vista Ultimate, we ran our WorldBench 6 benchmark, as well as media encoding and image processing tests. The results we obtained were fast -- for an AMD platform.
Referenced against a dual-core AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ CPU running at 2.6GHz, the L1N64-SLI-WS scored 18 percent better in WorldBench 6 tests. The 3ds Max rendering test, in particular, showed a dramatic improvement on the Quad FX platform, almost halving the amount of time it took to complete.
However, it wasn't as zippy as the result produced by Intel's Core 2 Extreme QX6800 using the same hardware (except for the motherboard, which was an ASUS P5B Premium with an Intel P965 chipset). The breakdown in WorldBench 6 shows the L1N64-SLI-WS quad-core AMD solution trailing the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6800 by 40sec in the 3ds Max rendering test, by 67sec in the multitasking test and by 117sec in the Photoshop test.
The MP3 encoding test was also in favour of the Core 2 Extreme, despite the fact that the Athlon 64 FX-74 CPUs have a higher clock speed. It took just 43sec for the Core 2 Extreme to finish this task and CPU usage peaked at 67 percent. The quad-core AMD platform took 50sec to encode 53min worth of WAV files to 56Kbps MP3 files using iTunes and CPU usage peaked at 74 percent. The CPU usage for both the Intel and AMD platforms indicated that at least three of the cores were used to complete the task. When compared to the AMD Athlon 64 X2 system, which is only a dual-core system, the same task took 92sec, with up to 95 percent of the dual-core CPU getting used.
In the Neat Image test, the Intel Core 2 Extreme cleaned up our digital photo in less than a second, while the quad-core AMD platform took slightly longer -- 1.1sec. Neat Image can use all four CPU cores and CPU usage peaked at 100 percent on both platforms during this test. The dual-core Athlon 64 5000+ took 2.8sec -- 1.7sec slower than the quad-core.
The slower results against the Core 2 chip are a little surprising as the Athlon 64 FX resembles an Opteron server chip more than a typical Athlon 64 X2 desktop chip, and should've put up a better showing. In saying that, it didn't get clobbered by the Core 2; in fact, it managed to keep up nicely, despite having only 1MB of Level 2 cache for each of its cores (the Core 2 has a shared 4MB Level 2 cache for each pair of its cores). AMD will be releasing a new chip in August, called Phenom, which will include single-chip quad-core CPUs, and we're looking forward to seeing if it can bridge this gap in performance. For now though, Intel's Core 2 Extreme QX6800 is the fastest quad-core chip we've tested. It beat the quad-core AMD platform in all our workloads.
While AMD's quad-core solution may not currently be faster than a quad-core solution based on an Intel CPU, the L1N64-SLI-WS does have redeeming factors when compared against an equivalent quad-core-capable Intel motherboard. For starters, it has the potential to be upgraded to run eight cores in the future. It has double the amount of SATA ports (12 compared to 6), ten USB 2.0 ports, it has two gigabit Ethernet connections, and it has four PCI Express graphics slots, two of which can be used for a full-speed SLI configuration (the P5B Premium supports an ATI CrossFire configuration).
The final word: If you're in the market for a high-end quad-core configuration, the ASUS L1N64-SLI-WS is well worth a look. Even though the Athlon 64 FX-74 CPUs that run on this board are slower than Intel's high-end Core 2 Extreme QX6800, ASUS says the board will run AMD's set to be released Phenom CPUs, which give this board the potential to run up to eight CPUs cores.
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
UE Boom 2 Bluetooth speaker
Lexar® JumpDrive® S57 USB 3.0 flash drive
Smart LED Bulb LB130
Everki ContemPRO Roll Top Laptop Backpack
Epson WorkForce ET-4550
Epson EcoTank Expression ET-2500
Samsung portable 1TB T3 drive
Linksys AC5400 MU-MIMO Gigabit router
Belkin MIXIT Metallic Lightning to USB Cable
Google Daydream VR headset
Lexar® JumpDrive® S45 USB 3.0 flash drive
Huawei Mate 9
Acer Swift 7
Lexar® Portable SSD
Logitech G403 Prodigy mouse
Epson WorkForce DS-360W
3SIXT Ultra HD Sports Action Camera
Dell Inspiron 5000 series 2-in-1
Lexar® JumpDrive® C20c USB Type-C flash drive
Audio-Technica ATH-ANC70 Noise Cancelling Headphones
HP Pavilion x360 13”
HD Pan/Tilt Wi-Fi Camera with Night Vision NC450
Garmin Fenix Chronos smartwatch
Blade 28 backpack by Arc’teryx
Dell XPS 13 laptop
Surface Pro 4
Lexar® Professional 1800x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Subaru XV 2017 review
- 2 Gigabyte Aorus GA-AX370-Gaming 5 AMD Ryzen AM4 motherboard review
- 3 Kogan curved 4K UHD 55-inch LED LCD TV review
- 4 Panasonic Blu-ray recorder PVR set-top box review
- 5 Garmin Fenix Chronos fitness tracker smartwatch review
Latest News Articles
- Future Intel CPUs could be cobbled together using different parts
- Intel digs deep to keep Moore's Law alive
- MIT researchers set out to create self-assembling chips
- Micron to ship Intel Optane competitor later this year
- Intel Optane Memory has a mission: Make hard drives faster than SSDs
PCW Evaluation Team
A smarter way to print for busy small business owners, combining speedy printing with scanning and copying, making it easier to produce high quality documents and images at a touch of a button.
I've had a multifunction printer in the office going on 10 years now. It was a neat bit of kit back in the day -- print, copy, scan, fax -- when printing over WiFi felt a bit like magic. It’s seen better days though and an upgrade’s well overdue. This HP OfficeJet Pro 8730 looks like it ticks all the same boxes: print, copy, scan, and fax. (Really? Does anyone fax anything any more? I guess it's good to know the facility’s there, just in case.) Printing over WiFi is more-or- less standard these days.
As a freelance writer who is always on the go, I like my technology to be both efficient and effective so I can do my job well. The HP OfficeJet Pro 8730 Inkjet Printer ticks all the boxes in terms of form factor, performance and user interface.
I’d happily recommend this touchscreen laptop and Windows 10 as a great way to get serious work done at a desk or on the road.
Ultimately, I think the Windows 10 environment is excellent for me as it caters for so many different uses. The inclusion of the Xbox app is also great for when you need some downtime too!
For me, the Xbox Play Anywhere is a great new feature as it allows you to play your current Xbox games with higher resolutions and better graphics without forking out extra cash for another copy. Although available titles are still scarce, but I’m sure it will grow in time.
- LG G6 phone: full, in-depth review
- Subaru XV 2017 review
- Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 phone: Full, in-depth review
- Which flagship TV is best? Sony 4K HDR Bravia 2016 versus LG 4K HDR OLED 2016
- 10 Blu-ray movies / Best looking Blu-ray movies
- FTSocial Media ExecutiveNSW
- FTDrupal Developer - SeniorQLD
- FTSolution Architect - SecurityVIC
- FTHyperion SpecialistNSW
- TPBusiness Analyst - DSITIQLD
- FTUX DesignerNSW
- CCCloud Infrastructure SpecialistNSW
- CCBusiness Solutions AnalystNSW
- FTAgile Business AnalystQLD
- FTBusiness Consultant - AccountingWA
- TPBusiness Implementation ManagerNSW
- FTDatabase Modelling SpecialistACT
- CCBusiness AnalystNSW
- TPSenior Project CoordinatorVIC
- CCOracle Middleware Production SupportACT
- CCSecurity Incident Analyst - Splunk - TelcoVIC
- CCProcurement OfficerQLD
- FTEnterprise ArchitectQLD
- TPFrontend Developer (React)NSW
- FTCloud Infrastructure Specialist - Azure/AWSNSW
- FTCCTV Sales & SupportNSW
- FTService Delivery ManagerWA
- FTSolution Architect l MS Exchange, O365NSW
- FTProduct Manager - FintechNSW