First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
CES - Vendors tune 802.11n devices to meet networking demands
- — 11 January, 2008 09:40
One of the surprises to emerge from CES 2008 is the idea that the 802.11n wireless LAN standard just isn't good enough.
Most if not all of the wireless chip makers are going above and beyond the IEEE standard to fine tune their 11n silicon to create a much more stable, better behaved and predictable signal than that found in today's wireless LAN gear. WLAN equipment vendors (compare enterprise WLAN products) are investing a lot of cash and engineering expertise toward the same end, in the products they wrap around those chips.
Much of that fine-tuning is being driven by the conviction that 11n will be the medium of choice for wirelessly streaming audio and especially video, in support of what Cisco CEO John Chambers has dubbed "visual networking."
Beyond basic networking
Network users in homes, home offices and small businesses are moving beyond basic wireless networking, says Phillip Pyo, product marketing director for Netgear. More than e-mail and Web surfing, users are focusing on advanced applications, such as high-definition video, on a variety of non-PC devices, including network attached storage boxes, Xboxes and other gaming consoles, and media servers. "All this requires a much more resilient, real-time, high-throughput wireless LAN," Pyo says.
"The Wi-Fi business has been very PC-centric," says Michael Hurlston, vice president and general manager of Broadcom's home and wireless networking business unit. "We're moving the Wi-Fi market into consumer electronics, such as set-top boxes and HDTV, and into portable CE devices such as handheld game consoles and smart phones."
The 11n chip makers are racing to make such a network with such devices possible. Broadcom used CES to unveil a single 11n chip, in new 65-nanometer process technology, that can transmit simultaneously on both the 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands, but is highly efficient in power use and dramatically smaller than the previous chipset.
For many of these applications, 11n is attractive not simply because of its raw data rates of 150M to 350Mbps, but also because of its consistent, higher throughput at greater distances, Hurlston says. "Even 802.11g can do high definition [video] streaming," he says. "But it can't do consistent streaming at range. Our goal is to provide 10Mbps at every point in the [entire] house."
The real 11n differences
Hurlston says the differences in 11n won't be in "speeds and feeds" but in how well it supports emerging applications.
To that end, Broadcom features dynamic power control, to selectively drop radio power levels to clients who are near, so that power can be boosted for those further away. It also offers new bandwidth-management features that shift the amount of bandwidth among the connected clients to meet different application needs. And the company says its 11n reference design was the first certified by the FCC for dynamic frequency selection, a technique for sidestepping military or weather systems. The practical result is that it frees up an additional 15 channels for transmissions.
Rival Atheros Communications is also working on "tailoring the wireless LAN for this [new] kind of traffic -- other than data," says Todd Antes, vice president of marketing. One way is to make 11n, in effect, more aware of the broadband WAN connection and prioritize the incoming traffic accordingly.
At CES, Atheros simulated an admittedly generous 6Mbps Internet connection to an 11n dual-band access point with Atheros chips. Over that link came a BitTorrent session and, from a server, a movie clip in Standard Definition Video (SD Video), essentially simulating a 5Mbps IPTV session. The access point sent both streams to a notebook PC. A utility on the PC showed the bandwidth allocation that an Atheros algorithm was making, having sensed the simulated, incoming service provider pipe and prioritized the two streams, reserving about 85% of the wireless bandwidth for the movie.
A monitor showed the different, but consistent, bandwidth utilization of the two sessions, and the notebook's screen showed a perfect display of the movie. When the algorithm was shut off, almost at once the BitTorrent utilization spiked sharply, and inconsistently, and the movie's image began breaking up.