Twitch fights view-inflating bot makers with lawsuit

The lawsuit is part of an effort by the livestreaming site to prevent video creators from gaming the system and artificially inflating their view counts.

Twitch has just about had it with bots that artificially inflate view counts for videos. In fact, it’s taking the makers of such bots to court.

In a post published to the Twitch Blog on Friday, Matthew DiPietro, Twitch’s senior vice president of marketing, explained how the company is working to combat fraudulent view counts. In addition to the current steps Twitch takes—such as human moderation and technical measures to combat view-count inflation—the company announced that it would sue “seven of the most active sellers” of video view-inflating bots.

In Twitch’s formal complaint (PDF), which it filed with the United States District Court in San Jose, the company describes the bot services as “illicit and illegal,” and states that, “these deceptive actions inflate viewer statistics for some channels while harming legitimate broadcaster channels by decreasing their discoverability.”

“That, in turn, hurts the quality of the experience community members have come to expect from Twitch,” the claim continues.

Twitch’s filing also explains how gaming the system with bots harms other streamers who use the service legitimately, and “make it harder for Twitch users to discover legitimate broadcasters and for those broadcasters to succeed.”

The story behind the story: Although it may not seem like a big deal to viewers, view-count inflation is a big issue for streamers and video producers, especially given how it can impact a streamer’s bottom line. It isn’t new to Twitch, and it isn’t exclusive to Twitch.

Other sites, such as YouTube, also employ tactics to cut down on view-count inflation. In YouTube’s case, if a video surpassed 301 views, that video’s page would temporarily stop updating the view count so that YouTube could filter out “dubious” views, according to Business Insider. YouTube has since updated its filtering system so that it will filter out suspicious views on the fly, as The Verge reported last year.

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags Twitch

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Nick Mediati

PC World (US online)
Show Comments

Father’s Day Gift Guide

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?