OCZ RD400 SSD review: This lightning-fast drive is OCZ's redemption

This PCIe-NVMe drive posts impressive speeds.

[See this to discover Australian availability]

Congratulations, OCZ. You can come out of hiding now—no longer are you defined by the bargain-basement Trion line and Toshiba TLC NAND. The RD400 signals that all is again as it should be in OCZ-land. This M.2 PCIe-NVMe SSD reaches a read speed of 2.1GBps, meaning the company is once again shipping products that pursue the limits of performance. Thank goodness.

M.2 SSD variations

M.2 SSDs span three distinct types: SATA, PCIe-AHCI, and PCIe-NVMe. The first uses the SATA bus that some M.2 sockets implement, and is no faster than 2.5-inch SATA SSDs. The advantages are small size and convenience. The other two types use M.2’s PCIe channels (not all M.2 slots have them) and vary only in the transport protocol: the older AHCI, or the newer NVMe. (The RD400, as mentioned earlier, uses NVMe.) In most designs to date, AHCI can hang with NVMe when writing, at around 1.2GBps, but NVMe is far faster at reading. You’ll usually get 2GBps or more with NVMe compared to AHCI’s range of 1.1GBps to 1.4GBps.

rd400 aic front OCZ

The RD400 on its x4 PCIe adapter.

Note that even if your M.2 slot supports PCIe, your motherboard’s BIOS must support NVMe to boot from an M.2 PCIe-NVMe drive. Most performance motherboards have been upgraded for this, but many mainstream models have not. Older PCIe-AHCI M.2 drives are far more likely to be hassle-free boot drives.

Testing and performance

The RD400 tested just a tad slower than its rival, the Samsung 950 Pro, in AS SSD’s sequential tests. It read at about the same 2.1GBps, but was some 200MBps off the pace writing. That may sound like a lot, because the dip from 1.4GBps to 1.2GBps is almost a 15 percent drop-off. But at those speeds, the difference is subjectively unnoticeable.

In the 4K threaded tests, the RD400’s results were the inverse of the 950 Pro’s. OCZ’s new drive nearly doubled the 950 Pro’s writing, but fell well short of its rival’s read speed. If you’re running an application that scattershots small writes, then the RD400 might be the better choice. For applications that read from multiple files simultaneously, then the 950 Pro will be what you want. However, threaded file writing is so new to the game that few applications are designed to take advantage of it.

Note also that this review’s results were obtained using a beta driver, as we did our testing prior to the product’s launch.

AS SSD Benchmark Chart

The RD400 is quite a bit faster than M.2 PCIe drives from previous generations, like the PCIe-NVMe Samsung SM951, as well as PCIe-AHCI drives like the Samsung XP941 and Kingston’s HyperX Predator.

We tested the RD400 on both the bundled x4 PCIe adapter and the M.2 PCIe slot integrated on our test motherboard. Performance was very consistent in AS SSD’s 10GB test, but there were variances of several hundred MBps in the 1GB test from run to run. We’re guessing that the cause is the beta driver used for testing, but it could be caching techniques. Regardless of the reason, it’s still a very fast drive.

AS SSD Benchmark Chart (4K Read / 4K Write)

Performance caveats

Part of the performance magic of SSDs is being able to write via multiple paths to multiple chips. We tested the 512GB version of the RD400, which can reach 2.1GBps for read speed and 1.3GBps for write speed. The 1TB version is rated for the same. However, the 128GB version of the RD400 is rated for half of that write speed, and the 256GB version about three-quarters. They read at roughly the same speeds as their larger siblings.

Toshiba is notoriously reticent about providing information on the controller and NAND—but my guess is the NAND is either MLC, or TLC being treated as such.

Warranty and price

All flavors of the RD400 carry a warranty of five years and 74TBW (terabytes written) for every 128GB of capacity. Rumor has it that this drive should exceed that estimate, but even if it doesn’t, that rating’s still on par with competing drives.

rd400 front OCZ

The RD400 itself is an M.2 PCIe SSD that can be used in any computer with an M.2 slot, or a PCIe slot when used with an adapter.

NVMe drives still cost quite a bit more than SATA models, but given the tripled speed, it’s a relatively small price to pay. The 128GB version of the RD400 is $110 (86 cents per GB), the 256GB version is $170 (66 cents per GB), the 512GB version $310 (61 cents per GB), and the 1TB version $740 (77 cents per GB). Add $20 to those prices if you want the version of the drive that comes with the PCIe adapter we used during testing.

Final thoughts

If your system supports NVMe, spend the money. Yes, if you opt for a normal SATA SSD, you’ll be pleased. But if you opt for an NVMe SSD, you’ll be amazed. It really is the best performance upgrade you can buy, bar none.

As far as the RD400 is concerned, stick with 256GB capacity or better, unless you’re truly strapped for cash. The 512GB version is the sweet spot in price-per-gigabyte and also offers the best performance.

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags OCZtoshiba

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Jon L. Jacobi

PC World (US online)
Show Comments

Cool Tech

Crucial Ballistix Elite 32GB Kit (4 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 UDIMM

Learn more >

Gadgets & Things

Lexar® Professional 1000x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Family Friendly

Lexar® JumpDrive® S57 USB 3.0 flash drive 

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Plox Star Wars Death Star Levitating Bluetooth Speaker

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?