US House votes to ban Internet access taxes permanently

The House vote would extend a moratorium that's been in place since 1998

The U.S. House of Representatives has passed a bill to permanently extend a 17-year moratorium on taxing Internet access and other online services.

By voice vote on Tuesday, the House agreed to pass the Permanent Internet Tax Freedom Act, which would prohibit states from taxing Internet access and from levying any new taxes that target Internet services but have no offline equivalent. The bill would prohibit taxes on bandwidth or email, for example.

Congress has passed temporary moratoriums since 1998, and the current moratorium is set to expire Oct. 1.

The House action sends the bill to the Senate. Some senators have resisted calls for a permanent tax moratorium in recent years.

Under the Permanent Internet Tax Freedom Act, Congress could still let states force Internet retailers to collect sales tax. Retail groups have been pushing Congress to allow online sales taxes for years, but lawmakers have resisted because of potential complications with collecting the tax.

Supporters of the bill argued new taxes could slow the adoption and growth of Internet commerce. If the tax moratorium is allowed to expire, Internet users would be hit with a "substantial tax burden," said Representative Bob Goodlatte, a Virginia Republican and bill sponsor.

The average tax rate across the U.S. on other communications services, such as mobile voice, is more than 13 percent, and Internet users could expect the same taxes if the moratorium expires, he said.

New taxes would hit poor U.S consumers especially hard, said Representative Anna Eshoo, a California Democrat. "We want to encourage expanded broadband adoption," she said. "If you tax it, you're going to shrink it."

Some Democrats objected to a permanent tax moratorium. Past moratoriums have allowed a handful of states that had Internet access or ISP taxes before 1998 to keep them, but the new legislation ends that grandfather clause. The 10 states allowed to tax Internet access would lose about US$500 million a year in revenue, said Representative Sheila Jackson Lee, a Texas Democrat.

States with Internet access taxes include Texas, Ohio, Wisconsin and Tennessee. The bill will "severely impact" the budgets of the grandfathered states, with Texas losing the biggest amount, Jackson Lee said.

The Retail Industry Leaders Association, a trade group, called on the Senate to pass Internet sales tax legislation in addition to the moratorium.

"Sales tax parity should be addressed as part of legislation extending the moratorium on taxing Internet access," Jennifer Safavian, the group's executive vice president for government affairs, said by email. "Retailers support keeping Internet access tax free while closing the online loophole that essentially subsidizes online-only retailers against their brick and mortar competitors."

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's email address is

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags e-commerceU.S. House of RepresentativesAnna EshooRetail Industry Leaders AssociationJennifer SafavianlegislationSheila Jackson LeegovernmentinternetBob Goodlatte

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Grant Gross

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles


GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy


First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni


For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell


The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi


The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott


My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?