CTIA sues over another cellphone radiation law

The mobile industry group says Berkeley's new city law violates retailers' freedom of speech

Checking mobile phone.

Checking mobile phone.

The mobile industry is trying to shoot down another law requiring cellphone radiation warnings.

CTIA sued the city of Berkeley, California, on Monday, taking aim at a law passed in May that would force cellphone retailers to post a notice about safety from radiofrequency radiation emitted by handsets. CTIA, the main trade group for U.S. mobile operators, says the law will force its members to pass on an inaccurate message that they don't agree with.

Just a few years ago, CTIA successfully fought a similar law in nearby San Francisco. That law required phone sellers to disclose the emissions produced by each model. The disputes are part of a smoldering debate over whether phones and other wireless devices give off radiation that may be harmful to humans. CTIA, and the Federal Communications Commission, say there is no evidence of a health risk from approved devices.

Berkeley's warning message says carrying a phone in a pocket or tucked into a bra could expose users to radiation above federal guidelines. "The potential risk is greater for children," the warning says. It advises consumers to read the instructions included with their phone for information about how to use it safely.

The law uses the fact that radiation tests for phones aren't conducted with the handset right next to the body, even though many people carry them that way. CTIA says that's misleading because FCC-approved tests are done at levels well above what users are normally exposed to and there's no evidence of a risk even when radiation levels exceed the FCC limits. There's no evidence that children are at greater risk, either, it says.

"In short, when a cell phone is certified as compliant with the FCC's guidelines, that phone is safe, however it is worn, even if a particular usage results in exposure 'well above' the limit," CTIA said in its complaint.

The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for Northern California, came soon after the Berkeley City Council unanimously passed the law on May 26. The law is due to take effect after 30 days.

Berkeley's law violates phone retailers' freedom of speech under the First Amendment, the complaint said. If allowed to stand, it will lead other local governments to follow Berkeley's lead, creating a mishmash of different laws about what retailers have to tell consumers, CTIA said.

The City of Berkeley declined to comment on pending litigation.

Stephen Lawson covers mobile, storage and networking technologies for The IDG News Service. Follow Stephen on Twitter at @sdlawsonmedia. Stephen's e-mail address is stephen_lawson@idg.com

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags telecommunicationconsumer electronicsCarrierssmartphonesCivil lawsuitslegalctiamobile

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Stephen Lawson

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles


GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy


First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni


For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell


The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi


The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott


My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?