Apple, A123 to settle lawsuit over poached battery engineers

The two companies face a May 27 deadline on a motion to move the case, but a settlement is near, say court documents

Electric car battery maker A123 Systems is close to settling a lawsuit alleging Apple poached some of its top employees.

A123 has requested a new extension to reply to Apple's motion to move to the case from federal court in Massachusetts to one in northern California, saying a settlement was near, according to court documents filed Monday.

A123 and Apple "have reached an agreement, signed a term sheet, and are in the process of drafting a final settlement agreement," said the document.

A123 initially had until May 6 to reply to Apple's motion. The new extension moves that deadline to May 27. Neither Apple nor lawyers for A123 replied to requests for comment.

In the initial lawsuit, A123 claimed Apple "raided" the Waltham, Massachusetts, company and hired five employees, including two top-level engineers. The loss of these workers essentially forced A123 to shut down some of its main projects, the suit alleged.

A123 alleged its former workers were helping Apple develop batteries that could be used in an electric car it was supposedly building. The lawsuit, filed in February, fanned speculation that Apple was entering the automotive space.

Apple had attempted to have the case dismissed, calling the charges speculative, or moved to a court in California because the former A123 employees now work in the state.

The lawsuit is the latest chapter in A123's saga. After going public in 2009, the company later went bankrupt. Chinese auto parts maker Wanxiang Group eventually purchased A123 for around US$257 million in 2013.

Fred O'Connor writes about IT careers and health IT for The IDG News Service. Follow Fred on Twitter at @fredjoconnor. Fred's e-mail address is fred_o'

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags A123 SystemsApplelegal

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Fred O'Connor

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles


GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy


First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni


For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell


The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi


The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott


My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?