Verizon and Sprint to pay a total of $158M for unauthorized text billing

The carriers agreed to settlements after federal complaints that they allowed charges to be crammed onto customer bills

Mobile carriers Verizon Wireless and Sprint will pay a combined US$158 million[m] to settle complaints by two U.S. government agencies that they billed millions[m] of customers for unauthorized, third-pay text messaging services.

Verizon will pay $90 million[m] and Sprint $68 million[m] to settle the so-called bill cramming complaints brought by the Federal Communications Commission and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Along with other recent federal and state actions targeting bill cramming, the nation's four largest mobile phone carriers have agreed to pay $353 million[m] in penalties and restitution in recent months, with more than $267 million[m] set aside to be returned to affected customers, the FCC said on Tuesday.

"For too long, consumers have been charged on their phone bills for things they did not buy," FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said in a statement. "We call these fraudulent charges 'cramming,' and with today's agreements we are calling them history for Verizon and Sprint customers."

The monthly charges for the third-party premium text-messaging services ranged from $0.99 to $14.00, but often were $9.99 per month, the agencies said.

Verizon took a 30 percent cut for each third-party charge it billed, while Sprint received about 35 percent, and the text message charges generated "numerous" complaints to federal agencies, they said.

Under the agreements, Verizon's settlement will include a minimum of $70 million[m] to fund a consumer redress program, $16 million[m] for state governments participating in the settlement, and $4 million[m] as a fine paid to the U.S. Treasury.

Sprint's settlement will include a minimum of $50 million to fund consumer redress, $12 million[m] for state governments participating in the settlement, and a $6 million[m] fine. The settlements were negotiated in coordination with the attorneys general of all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

The settlements include requirements that both companies revamp their internal processes and change they way they disclose information to customers. The settlements also require that the two companies obtain informed consent from customers before allowing third-party charges, clearly identify third-party charges on bills and no longer offer commercial third-party premium text charges.

AT&T agreed to a $105 million[m] settlement last October, and">T-Mobile USA to a $90 million[m] settlement in December.

Asked for comment, Verizon said that it no longer allows third-party billing for premium text services, a practice it says it stopped before the FCC's action.

Meanwhile, Sprint has encouraged customers who believe they've been wrongly charged for text services to contact the company for refunds, and disbursed "tens of millions of dollars" in refunds before the government's investigation started, according to a spokesman.

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's email address is

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags sprinttelecommunicationat&tregulationU.S. Federal Communications CommissionmobilegovernmentU.S. Consumer Financial Protection BureauT-Mobile USAVerizon Wireless

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Grant Gross

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles


GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy


First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni


For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell


The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi


The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott


My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?