Uber's Indian rival Ola being probed for 'predatory pricing'

Ola is being probed by antitrust body Competition Commission of India

Ola, India's largest ride-hailing service, is being probed by the Competition Commission of India for 'predatory pricing,' including for allegedly spending more than its revenue per trip by offering incentives to customers and drivers.

The probe reflects the fierce competition in the Indian ride-hailing market, with a number of well-funded companies investing large sums to get a quick lead in the market.

The CCI has initiated the investigation following a complaint by rival Fast Track Call Cab that ANI Technologies, which runs Ola, is using funds raised, including from Japan's SoftBank, to wipe out equally efficient competitors who cannot indulge in such predatory pricing in the radio taxi services market. Fast Track has also charged Ola with creating barriers for new entrants.

The CCI has clubbed together taxi services that offer booking by phone or computer or through an app as "radio taxi services," which it considers different from traditional yellow-black colored taxis that have been in operation in the country for years. It has also arrived at the preliminary conclusion that Ola holds a dominant position in the radio taxi services market of Bangalore, which was the city named in the complaint.

Fast Track has also alleged that Ola restricts its driver fleet operators from using any other competing platform for providing their services. Ola is also said to have "incentivized" its drivers unrealistically by using the money raised from foreign investors, which cannot be matched by existing radio cab operators or local enterprises planning to start similar operations in the country.

Based on the material placed on record, the CCI observed that Ola spends per trip around 574 rupees (US$9), while earning an average revenue of 344 rupees, leading to a direct loss of 230 rupees per trip.

"While the propriety of these figures is a subject matter of investigation, prima facie, the Commission is of the view that, they indicate predatory pricing aimed to oust other players from the relevant market," the agency said.

ANI acquired in March a smaller rival TaxiForSure, run by Serendipity Infolabs, for $200 million.

The potential of the Indian market has become evident with Uber Technologies making a pitch for it. But the U.S. company ran into a controversy in December with local authorities after its driver in Delhi allegedly raped a woman passenger. Uber was banned in the city after the incident. Other app-based taxi companies have also come under scrutiny following the rape. Delhi's transport department framed new rules, called the Radio Taxi Scheme, which puts tighter controls on taxi operators.

ANI did not immediately comment on the CCI probe.

John Ribeiro covers outsourcing and general technology breaking news from India for The IDG News Service. Follow John on Twitter at @Johnribeiro. John's e-mail address is john_ribeiro@idg.com

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags Fast Track Call CabInternet-based applications and servicesANI Technologiesinternet

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

John Ribeiro

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles


GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy


First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni


For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell


The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi


The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott


My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?