Researchers play cat and mouse with Google's anti-phishing Chrome extension

Security researchers found nine different ways to defeat Google's Password Alert extension for Chrome

For the past several days security researchers have raced to demonstrate that phishing protections added by a new Google Chrome extension can be bypassed with ease.

The Password Alert extension, developed by Google and released Wednesday, is designed to alert Chrome users when they input their Gmail passwords on websites that don't belong to Google and are therefore part of phishing attacks.

By Thursday, an information security consultant named Paul Moore had already devised a method that attackers could use to block the extension's alerts.

Google fixed that initial bypass in a new version released Friday, but since then it's been a cat and mouse game between Google's developers and security researchers who kept finding more and more ways to defeat the extension.

At the moment, the tally stands at nine bypasses, the latest of which was developed by Moore today. According to the researcher, only three of them have been patched by Google so far. The extension's latest version -- 1.6 -- was released Friday.

The majority of these exploits can be resolved easily, but a couple are difficult, if not impossible, to fix, Moore said Monday via email.

For example, an exploit developed by researchers from Dutch software security company Securify works by sandboxing an IFRAME.

"I can't see how Securify's sandbox exploit can be resolved without nullifying the sandbox completely," Moore said. "Likewise, my 'refresh on keypress' bypass works by exploiting a race condition which an extension probably cannot resolve."

In response to these exploits, the head of the webspam team at Google, Matt Cutts, commented on Twitter that: "A world in which every single phisher in the world has to play catchup/counterattack is a better world than today."

While that might be true, it's also a bit disingenuous, Moore said. "These exploits, some of which are downright comical, put the user at a disadvantage, not the attacker."

The extension will protect against the simplest phishing attacks and for that Google should be commended, but it arguably offers little protection against more sophisticated attacks and "no security is better than a false sense of security," the researcher said.

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags Securifyonline safetyGooglesecurityscamsExploits / vulnerabilities

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Lucian Constantin

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Father’s Day Gift Guide

Most Popular Reviews

Best Deals on Good Gear Guide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?