Forever 21 denies pirating Adobe software, strikes back

The retailer claims Adobe, Corel and Autodesk charge accused pirates exorbitant license fees

Retail chain Forever 21 has denied making illegal copies of Adobe's software, as the Photoshop maker alleged in a lawsuit, and shot back that Adobe tries to bully customers who are accused of piracy into paying exorbitant license fees.

Adobe sued Forever 21 in January, in a copyright lawsuit filed along with software makers Corel and Autodesk. All three companies claim that Forever 21 "wilfully, maliciously and intentionally" used their software without proper licenses.

The retailer skirted copy protection technologies to illegally install software on its computers, they said. And it continued the behavior after it was alerted by Adobe to its infringement, according to the lawsuit, filed in federal district court in Northern California. The companies want a jury trial to determine financial damages.

Forever 21 filed its response to the lawsuit Wednesday, denying it has infringed any copyrights.

It lays out several defenses including "fair use," which allows for limited copying in some circumstances, and a "de minimis" defense, which basically means the amount of any code it might have copied was too small to matter.

Intriguingly, it also says the software makers filed their lawsuit with "unclean hands," a legal term meaning they acted unethically or in bad faith. Specifically, Forever 21 refers to "their practice of paying unidentified third parties to 'inform' on alleged infringers and then demanding exorbitant license fees to avoid a lawsuit."

It doesn't provide any more detail, but the retailer might be referring to a program operated by the Software Publishers Association, which offers rewards to people who report businesses for piracy. The rewards can range from $500 to $1 million, depending on the offense.

Forever 21 doesn't mention the SPA in its answer to the complaint, but it disclosed to the court in a separate filing that the industry group could be an "interested party" to the case.

It probably doesn't mean that Forever 21 thinks such rewards programs are illegal, but that Adobe demands unreasonable license fees from companies so they can avoid going to court.

An attorney for Forever 21 had no immediate comment, and Adobe couldn't immediately be reached.

Among its other defenses, Forever 21 says some of the software isn't protected by copyright because it's "functional," "not original," or otherwise "not protected by the asserted copyrights." It also says there was an "implied" license for the software because it came bundled with other products.

Forever 21 asks for a jury trial to sort the matter out.

James Niccolai covers data centers and general technology news for IDG News Service. Follow James on Twitter at @jniccolai. James's e-mail address is james_niccolai@idg.com

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags applicationsintellectual propertycopyrightAdobe Systemslegalsoftware

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

James Niccolai

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Cool Tech

Crucial Ballistix Elite 32GB Kit (4 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 UDIMM

Learn more >

Gadgets & Things

Lexar® Professional 1000x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Family Friendly

Lexar® JumpDrive® S57 USB 3.0 flash drive 

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Plox Star Wars Death Star Levitating Bluetooth Speaker

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?