UK government filing raises fears about misuse of hacking powers

UK intelligence agency GCHQ maintained in a submission that it operates within the law

A legal filing by the U.K. government has raised fears that the country's intelligence service GCHQ is misusing its powers to hack telecommunications companies in other countries.

The document was made public by Privacy International and the Chaos Computer Club, both claimants in a lawsuit filed last year against GCHQ over its spying practices. In the filing, which is part of the case, the U.K. government claims it has the right to break into computers anywhere in the world, even if they are not connected to a crime or a threat to national security, the groups said.

In a part of the document titled "collateral intrusion," the U.K. government stated that it can conduct "equipment interference activity specifically against individuals who are not intelligence targets in their own right," adding that those intrusions should be regarded as intended.

While GCHQ needs a warrant approved by the U.K.'s Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, who oversees the intelligence service, hacking outside Britain is subject to a much lower standard for approval, requiring only a "broad class of operations" to be authorized by the official, Privacy International said. GCHQ does not have to identify a specific target and does not explicitly have to identify a connection of a threat to national security or a serious crime, it added.

The group is worried GCHQ has used this broad hacking power to allegedly hack into Belgacom using malware. The same measure could also have been used to justify targeting Gemalto, the world's largest maker of SIM cards, in a reported effort by GCHQ and its U.S. counterpart, the National Security Agency, to obtain encryption keys to spy on mobile phone conversations, Privacy International said.

The intelligence agencies likely broke in but didn't manage to steal encryption keys, according to Gemalto.

The government has granted itself incredible powers to break into devices and now, without any legal justification, they think that they have the authority to target anyone they wish, Privacy International said, adding that the hacking without suspicion must come to an end.

GCHQ brushed off Privacy International's worries. Assertions that GCHQ can carry out computer network exploitation (CNE) operations to gain covert access to equipment in an unregulated way are simply untrue, it said in a statement. "Strict legal controls, safeguards and requirements apply to this activity, which can only be carried out for the statutory purposes e.g. national security," it added.

The government document relies heavily on a draft code on equipment interference. That code was released by the U.K. government on Feb. 6, the same day the U.K. Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) ruled that GCHQ had unlawfully shared information with NSA before December 2014.

The draft code has not yet been approved by the U.K. Parliament, and it is open for public comment until March 20.

The Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee last week found that the U.K.'s intelligence and security agencies are doing the necessary work to uncover threats, for instance by accessing Internet traffic through bulk interception. The agencies do not seek to circumvent the law, the committee found. Nevertheless, it did recommend that unnecessarily complicated and unclear legislation governing the intrusive capabilities of those services should be replaced by a single, clear rule.

Loek is Amsterdam Correspondent and covers online privacy, intellectual property, online payment issues as well as EU technology policy and regulation for the IDG News Service. Follow him on Twitter at @loekessers or email tips and comments to loek_essers@idg.com

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags securitylegalCivil lawsuitsdata protectionprivacyGCHQ

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Loek Essers

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Cool Tech

Crucial Ballistix Elite 32GB Kit (4 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 UDIMM

Learn more >

Gadgets & Things

Lexar® Professional 1000x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Family Friendly

Lexar® JumpDrive® S57 USB 3.0 flash drive 

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Plox Star Wars Death Star Levitating Bluetooth Speaker

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?