Feds go after operator of revenge porn site

The FTC charged Craig Brittain with obtaining nude photos under false pretenses and then charging to remove them from the site

U.S. federal regulators are clamping down on revenge porn, taking aim at a website whose operator allegedly deceived women into sending intimate photos of themselves and then charged them to have the pictures removed.

Craig Brittain operated isanybodydown.com, which displayed the images, and offered a "content removal service" that charged women between US$200 and $500 to have their images and personal information deleted from the site, according to a complaint filed against him by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission.

Now Brittain must permanently delete all the images and personal information he received while operating the site, under a settlement with the FTC announced Thursday. It's the FTC's first case against a revenge porn site.

"This behavior is not only illegal but reprehensible," said Jessica Rich, director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection, in a statement.

Brittain neither admitted nor denied any of the allegations in the draft complaint.

He obtained more than a thousand images for the site, and his actions violated Section 5 of the U.S. FTC Act, which prohibits "unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce," according to an FTC spokesman. His actions were unfair because he posted the images and other information without people's permission and they were deceptive because he obtained the content by posing as someone else, the spokesman said.

Brittain obtained the images in a number of ways, the FTC said, such as by posing as a woman on Craigslist, and offering nude photos purportedly of himself in exchange for photos provided by women. He also required submissions to include personal information about the people in the photos, the agency said, like their full name, phone number, city of residence and Facebook profile.

Under the terms of the settlement, Brittain is also prohibited from misrepresenting how he will use any personal information he collects online. There is no financial component, but if Brittain does not honor the settlement he could face a civil penalty of up to $16,000 per day per violation.

Brittain generated about $12,000 from the site.

There is a 30-day public comment period before the settlement is finalized. The FTC spokesman declined to comment on whether revenge porn would become a growing area of regulatory action for the agency.

Brittain said last year he would be shutting down the "Is Anybody Down" site, but he had operated an additional site, obamanudes.com, that was similar. He did not respond to a request for comment sent via a Twitter account identified as his.

Zach Miners covers social networking, search and general technology news for IDG News Service. Follow Zach on Twitter at @zachminers. Zach's e-mail address is zach_miners@idg.com

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags Internet-based applications and servicesFederal Trade Commissionlegalsocial mediainternetvideo

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Zach Miners

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Cool Tech

Crucial Ballistix Elite 32GB Kit (4 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 UDIMM

Learn more >

Gadgets & Things

Lexar® Professional 1000x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Family Friendly

Lexar® JumpDrive® S57 USB 3.0 flash drive 

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Plox Star Wars Death Star Levitating Bluetooth Speaker

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?