Verizon appears to soften its stance against net neutrality rules

The broadband provider, which sued the FCC over the agency's 2010 rules, says it might not challenge a basic set of regulations

Verizon Communications seems to be softening its stance against net neutrality rules, suggesting it could live with a basic set of regulations.

Verizon had been the only one of the four largest U.S. broadband providers to oppose any new net neutrality rules being considered by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission, but in a blog post this week, the company seemed to endorse rules originally proposed by FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler earlier this year.

Verizon went to court and successfully challenged the FCC's 2010 net neutrality rules, similar in some ways to Wheeler's proposal. Wheeler's original proposal this year would allow broadband providers to engage in "commercially reasonable" traffic management, although he now says he's open to stronger net neutrality protections.

While some tech policy analysts are predicting more lawsuits challenging the FCC no matter what it does with net neutrality, Verizon discounted those predictions in its blog post. The FCC could avoid litigation if it adopts rules under Section 706 of the Communications Act, which gives the agency authority to encourage broadband deployment, Verizon said, instead of reclassifying broadband as a public utility as some advocates of strong net neutrality rules want.

"Don't believe those who say that further litigation is inevitable," wrote Randal Milch, Verizon's general counsel for public policy. "The bottom line is that effective Net Neutrality rules -- without further judicial intervention -- are within reach, if the FCC takes the Section 706 route it originally proposed."

Milch's blog post comes just days after news reports that Wheeler is considering a so-called hybrid net neutrality approach that would regulate back-end transit service as a public utility under Title II of the Communications Act.

Verizon has opposed reclassification of broadband under Title II. If the FCC goes that route, it will likely face legal challenges, because "the ISPs, and perhaps some in the tech industry, will have no choice but to fight the sudden reversal of two decades of settled law," Milch wrote.

A Verizon spokesman didn't immediately respond to a message seeking comment on Verizon's net neutrality stance.

Last Thursday, Verizon released a lengthy white paper arguing against Title II reclassification.

While Verizon's position on reclassification remains unchanged, its apparent embrace of rules under Section 706 seem to be evolving. As recently as mid-September, Verizon's lawyers filed comments at the FCC opposed to any new rules.

"The fundamental premise of those urging expansive regulation here -- that there is an openness 'problem' that must be fixed -- is bankrupt," Verizon's lawyers wrote then. "The comments seeking aggressive new rules are long on rhetoric and unsupported 'what ifs,' but utterly bereft of real-world examples in which any American broadband provider has harmed consumers by blocking or degrading traffic at any time since the commission first began considering open Internet rules in the late 2000s."

Verizon, in September, suggested the FCC allow broadband providers flexibility, and resisted any major changes in net neutrality rules. "Because the commission's light-touch approach to Internet regulation has reaped enormous consumer benefits over the last two decades, the commission should stay that course and not adopt any new rules," its lawyers wrote.

Advocates of strong net neutrality rules discounted Verizon's apparent shift this week.

"All of the carriers know they can live with the soft, hole-filled version of 706 rules that Verizon's court victory would require," Matt Wood, policy director at Free Press, said by email. "So rather than softening their actual stance, they're changing their rhetoric without changing their goals."

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's email address is grant_gross@idg.com.

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags free presstelecommunicationregulationU.S. Federal Communications CommissionRandal MilchgovernmentinternetMatt WoodVerizon CommunicationsInternet service providersbroadbandTom Wheeler

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Grant Gross

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Cool Tech

Crucial Ballistix Elite 32GB Kit (4 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 UDIMM

Learn more >

Gadgets & Things

Lexar® Professional 1000x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Family Friendly

Lexar® JumpDrive® S57 USB 3.0 flash drive 

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Plox Star Wars Death Star Levitating Bluetooth Speaker

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?