Facebook vows to improve user research practices (so we're not just guinea pigs)

New guidelines, however, are light on details

Facebook is promising to be more careful about how it conducts research on users, with a deeper review process by top managers when particular groups of people or types of content are studied on the site.

However, the company did not say whether it would include outside researchers or regulators in its review process. Facebook also did not clarify how it would determine whether a particular study is ethical. Nor did it say under which circumstances, if any, it would tell users when they are included in a study.

But an enhanced review process will take place before research can begin, said Mike Schroepfer, chief technology officer at Facebook, in a Thursday blog post. Further review will take place if the work involves collaboration with someone in the academic community, he said.

Facebook did not immediately respond to a request for additional information.

The company has created a review panel, including subject-area researchers and employees from its engineering, research, legal, privacy and policy teams.

Education around the firm's research practices will also be incorporated into Facebook's six-week training program for new engineers.

The guidelines come after Facebook took a close look over three months at the way it does research, Schroepfer said. The framework covers both the firm's internal work and also research that might be published.

Facebook faced a backlash from users and touched off a controversy earlier this year over a study in 2012 in which it changed which posts users saw in their feeds based on emotional content to measure the effect on users' moods. Many people characterized the study as Facebook toying with or manipulating their emotions.

The Electronic Privacy Information Center lodged a complaint with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission about the research, saying that Facebook "purposefully messed with people's minds" in the "secretive and non-consensual" study on nearly 700,000 unsuspecting users.

"It is clear now that there are things we should have done differently," Schroepfer said Thursday.

Zach Miners covers social networking, search and general technology news for IDG News Service. Follow Zach on Twitter at @zachminers. Zach's e-mail address is zach_miners@idg.com

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags Internet-based applications and serviceslegalsocial networkingsocial mediainternetFacebook

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Zach Miners

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles


GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy


First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni


For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell


The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi


The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott


My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?