Who makes the better smartphone, Samsung or HTC?

Samsung's Galaxy S5 versus HTC's One (M8)

Megapixels, Ultrapixels and darn DuoCameras

Imaging is less straightforward. The two smartphones aim to deliver great photos, but they go about doing so in very different ways. The Galaxy S5 has an improved 16MP camera, whereas the HTC One models a 4MP ‘Ultrapixel’ camera coupled with a secondary ‘DuoCamera’.

None

The HTC One’s dual-camera does introduce some interesting functionalities, but the headlining innovation is its ability to change the point of focus in photos after they have been captured. For samples and a more detailed breakdown, we recommend checking out our review of the One M8 here.

Refocusing a photo, and the ability to do so easily, is a perk previously unavailable to smartphones. HTC’s range of animations are enticing, and the company’s willingness to work with developers in an effort to add even more is commendable. Unfortunately for HTC, the post-focus doesn’t work every time and, truth be told, it feel more gimmick than necessity.

Samsung left, HTC right: The HTC can discern more detail in dim environments
Samsung left, HTC right: The HTC can discern more detail in dim environments

Returning for the second year is the company’s Ultrapixel technology, which has proven adept at identifying detail in low-light environments. The new sensor captures even more than the predecessor and really does have a knack for improving photos taken at night. Come morning, however, where lighting is ample, HTC’s camera can be too sensitive and tends to wash out some detail.

Samsung left, HTC right: HTC's camera tends to brighten light colours and darkens shady areas
Samsung left, HTC right: HTC's camera tends to brighten light colours and darkens shady areas

The camera featured on the Galaxy S5 inspires more confidence because it does the same thing we’ve loved for years, only better. Photos are now twice the size at 16MP, and Samsung has worked hard to make the camera faster, better suited to different lighting conditions and a little more functional. It might be lacking in low-light detail, but having 16 megapixels worth of photo to crop makes up for this shortfall.

Samsung's 16MP on the left, to HTC's 4MP on the right
Samsung's 16MP on the left, to HTC's 4MP on the right

And it’s the same case with the Galaxy S5’s video camera as it supports the next-generation Ultra high-definition (UHD) standard. UHD isn’t ripe for day-to-day use, but maybe in the not-too-distant tomorrow we’ll see UHD become the norm. Having the option there certainly doesn’t hurt.

Comparing the front cameras isn’t as tricky. The Samsung Galaxy S5 has a 2MP front facing camera, and that is no match for the HTC One’s face detecting, wide lensed 5MP snapper.

Winner: Samsung Galaxy S5

Power

Punch after punch the HTC and Samsung flagships will slug it out when it comes to performance. Inside the smartphones almost mirror one another. Both smartphones in Australia are powered by a 2.5GHz quad-core CPU and have 2GB of RAM.

HTC will be releasing the One with 16GB of memory, whereas Samsung will offer the S5 in 16GB and 32GB options. Both smartphones support 128GB of expandable microSD memory.

None

The screens tell a similar tale of one-upmanship. Although the Galaxy S5’s 5.1in screen is fractionally larger than the One M8’s 5in screen, both displays have Full HD resolutions. This means the HTC One scores back points for having a higher pixel-per-inch count than the Samsung flagship.

Samsung has equipped the Galaxy S5 with a 2800 milliamp-hour(mAh) battery and that’s 200mAh more than that of the One. Both of the smartphones have clever software modes that disable superfluous functions in an effort to make the battery last longer. Samsung’s mode will deliver 24 hours of standby time from just 10 per cent of charge, but HTC’s will deliver 30 hours from the same amount, and that’s in spite of the smartphone being equipped with a smaller battery.

None

Individual preferences and needs will tip customers one way or the other. The marginal differences stand testament to the intense competition between the two companies and, for customers, that only is good news.

Winner: Draw

Click over to find out who makes the better smartphone

Tags AndroidiPhoneKitKat5SOnegalaxyM8samsungApplehtc4.4GoogleS5S5

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.
Tony Ibrahim

Tony Ibrahim

PC World

4 Comments

Bob G

1

My question is: do either of these phones have enough space in the battery area to accomadate my wireless charging pad? That will make a difference to me, and is something that has not been addressed in this review. Perhaps GGG could make this a consideration for future reviews?

Bayliss

2

Preordered my M8, puts all the kids at school with the iPhone 5S to shame.

IT_Observer

3

Seeing the comparisons and the upside-down of the G-S5, if Samsung is not willing to address the overly of the OS and the stupid reliance on Samsung store, then I can say good bye Samsung, I will switch sides and I will go and buy HTC One instead.
The clear winner is HTC (Samsung has been warned!)

Author

Staff

4

Bob G,

The HTC One doesn't have a removable cover, so that's out of the question. We also doubt the Samsung Galaxy S5 will support the charging pad you use as it has waterproofing on its back cover. Samsung may release its own wireless charging pad for the S5 in the future, but that's a betting man's game.

Tony

Post new comment

Users posting comments agree to the Good Gear Guide comments policy.

Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?