LabMD challenges FTC data security action in new lawsuit

The medical lab files a new lawsuit seeking to rein in the FTC's authority to bring data breach complaints

Atlanta cancer-screening laboratory LabMD has stepped up its challenge of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission's authority to enforce data security standards by filing a lawsuit against the agency.

LabMD on Thursday filed the lawsuit and a motion for a preliminary injunction asking the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia to suspend the FTC's enforcement action against the lab for two alleged data breaches.

The FTC, in an enforcement action filed in August, accused LabMD of a 2012 data beach affecting 500 customers and a 2008 breach in which a company spreadsheet contained sensitive personal information for more than 9,000 consumers was found on a peer-to-peer network. An FTC representative didn't immediately respond to a request for comments on the LabMD lawsuit.

LabMD's court challenge, if successful, could have a huge impact on data security practices in the U.S. Since 2000, the FTC has held that it has authority under the unfair business practices provisions in section 5 of FTC Act to bring enforcement actions against companies that have data breaches, when they don't use what the agency considers adequate data protection practices. LabMD contends that the U.S. Congress hasn't given the agency the authority to enforce data security standards.

"Congress has enacted numerous other targeted, narrowly tailored data-security statutes ... which are enforced by other agencies," LabMD's lawyers wrote in their request for an injunction. "These specific grants of jurisdiction control and trump the FTC's recently claimed general Section 5 'unfairness' data-security jurisdiction."

LabMD is one of two companies that have challenged the FTC's data security enforcement authority in the past year. Hotel operator Wyndham Worldwide has also filed a lawsuit against the FTC after the agency accused it of allowing three breaches, in 2008 and 2009, that led to millions of dollars in fraud losses.

LabMD closed in January and blamed the FTC enforcement action. The lab has previously filed an appeal of the FTC's enforcement action in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, but Thursday's lawsuit is an additional effort by the company to stall the FTC's enforcement actions.

"LabMD is suffering and will continue to suffer irreparable harm," the company's lawyers wrote. "The FTC's enforcement action has eviscerated LabMD's business, ruined its reputation, and wrongfully chilled constitutionally-protected speech."

Because of the FTC's "campaign of public disparagement," the lab is no longer receiving new samples to test, and three of its insurers have declined to renew their coverage, the company's lawyers wrote.

The FTC has failed to provide LabMD with due process, the company alleged. And the agency "retaliated" against the company by starting a formal enforcement action shortly after LabMD CEO Michael Daugherty began to speak out against the FTC's investigation, the company's lawyers alleged.

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's email address is grant_gross@idg.com.

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags U.S. Federal Trade CommissionWyndham Worldwidesecurityregulationdata breachgovernmentMichael DaughertyLabMD

Struggling for Christmas presents this year? Check out our Christmas Gift Guide for some top tech suggestions and more.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Grant Gross

IDG News Service

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?