Samsung requests retrial in $1B patent ruling for Apple

Apple's narrowing of a patent claim constitutes new evidence, Samsung says

Samsung Electronics has requested a new trial for a patent related to a US$1 billion infringement ruling against it in a case brought by rival Apple, due to a re-examination of the patent at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Samsung, in a petition filed late Monday, asked the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California to retry the damages portion of the patent infringement case for one of seven Apple patents Samsung was found to infringe last August.

The Samsung request for a retrial covers U.S. patent 7,469,381, a patent for list scrolling and document translation, scaling and rotation on a touchscreen display, known as Apple's overscroll bounce patent.

Earlier this year, the USPTO re-examined the Apple patent, and Samsung has learned that Apple has "successfully advocated a new claim construction ... and significantly narrowed its scope in connection with re-examination proceedings before the PTO to avoid having this claim rejected," Samsung's lawyers wrote in court documents.

While the USPTO confirmed Apple's patent claim, Apple "advocated an entirely new and far narrower interpretation" of the claim used against Samsung, Samsung's lawyers wrote. With the new interpretation, several Samsung products "cannot possibly infringe" Apple's claim on the patent, they wrote.

Samsung also asked the court for a stay in the case pending its appeal.

Last week, Samsung asked the court to remove its deadlines in the case because Apple's new damages expert had come up with larger damage estimates than previously asserted, reported Florian Mueller on Fosspatents.com. Apple accused Samsung of attempting to "delay and derail" the case.

Representatives of Apple and Samsung didn't immediately respond to requests for comments on the petition for retrial.

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags Appleconsumer electronicsintellectual propertysmartphoneslegalU.S. Patent and Trademark OfficeSamsung ElectronicspatentU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Struggling for Christmas presents this year? Check out our Christmas Gift Guide for some top tech suggestions and more.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Grant Gross

IDG News Service

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?