Samsung and Microsoft try to swipe pinch-to-zoom patent from Apple

Samsung and Microsoft have both tried to file the patent for pinch-to-zoom as if they own the rights to the technology

The cheek of it! Samsung and Microsoft have both tried to patent Apple's pinch-to-zoom.

Microsoft describes their technology thus: "The pinching motion is illustrated as two dotted line circles, which represent locations where the user is touching the touch screen, and simultaneously moving their fingers together. The application interprets this as a zoom-out indication." The patent was published by the US Patent Office this week, notes Patently Apple.

Samsung's patent application, reported by Patently Apple the following day, was filed on 30 August 2012 and also published this month. It describes a method for rendering a user interface with a size that "varies in response to a user's manipulation of the display unit."

Apple patented its so called 'Pinch-to-zoom' technology (Patent No. 7,844,915) for use on mobile devices back on 7 January 2007. It was first used it with the launch of the iPhone in 2007.

Back in 2010 when HTC introduced pinch-to-zoom functionality in a handset Apple's late CEO Steve Jobs reportedly "hit the roof", according to iDownloadBlog's report. Those two companies have now settled that dispute.

Apple also forced Google to disable multitouch on some Android devices due to its ownership of the patent.

Apple has licensed some of its design patents to Microsoft, but these do not include the pinch-zoom patent.

Pinch to zoom is one of six patents that Samsung was found to have infringed during the Apple v Samsung trial last year.

In December 2012 Samsung filed a complaint seeking to invalidate Apple's prized pinch zoom patent. The US Patent Office announced that the patent should never have been granted to Apple.

PatentlyApple notes that it's no wonder everyone wants ownership of this patent as it describes: "perfect features that you have to have in order to be a modern day touch-screen computer".

Follow Karen Haslam on Twitter / Follow MacworldUK on Twitter

Related

Apple: Samsung still infringing 'pinch-to-zoom' patent

Apple may lose pinch-to-zoom patent; Samsung set to appeal $1b fine

Apple v Samsung: complete summary of patent trial: UPDATED

Samsung tries to prove Apple doesn't own rubber-band and pinch-to-zoom patents

Tags Appleconsumer electronicshtcMicrosoftiPhonehardware systemssmartphonestabletsiPad

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Karen Haslam

Macworld U.K.

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?