Judge lowers Apple's $1 billion Samsung award, orders partial retrial

Apple and Samsung will have to start a new trial to determine some of the damages in the case

A judge has ordered a partial retrial in Apple's patent lawsuit against Samsung in California, and has cut hundreds of millions of dollars from the $1 billion in damages that Apple was awarded last summer.

Judge Koh, in an order published Friday, determined that the jury applied an "impermissable legal theory" when calculating the damages Apple should receive for Samsung's infringement of its patents.

Koh has struck about $450 million off of Apple's award and ordered a retrial to determine the correct damages related to about a dozen of the Samsung smartphones and tablets that were at issue in the trial.

She let stand Apple's damages award of $598 million for another 14 of the products.

The order doesn't mean Apple won't receive more than the $598 million, but it will have to go back to court to see how much money it can get.

The jury originally awarded Apple $1.05 billion for Samsung's violation of its patents, but Samsung asked for a retrial, arguing that some of the award was improperly calculated.

At issue is the date on which Apple notified Samsung that it was infringing some of its patents. Apple set that date too early in some cases, Koh said, which means the resulting damage calculations were too high.

Apple could have avoided the problems, Koh suggested.

"[I]t was Apples strategic decision to submit an expert report using an aggressive notice date for all of the patents. The need for a new trial could have been avoided had Apple chosen a more circumspect strategy or provided more evidence to allow the jury or the Court to determine the appropriate award for a shorter notice period," she wrote.

James Niccolai covers data centers and general technology news for IDG News Service. Follow James on Twitter at @jniccolai. James's e-mail address is james_niccolai@idg.com

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

James Niccolai

IDG News Service
Topics: Apple, consumer electronics, intellectual property, smartphones, legal, Civil lawsuits, Samsung Electronics, patent
Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Compare & Save

Deals powered by WhistleOut
Use WhistleOut's technology to compare:
Mobile phone plans & deals
Mobile phone models
Mobile phone carriers
Broadband plans & deals
Broadband providers
Deals powered by WhistleOut
WhistleOut

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?