Tokyo court rules Apple doesn't violate Samsung patent

The ruling on a wireless technology patent follows a similar victory for Samsung last year in Tokyo

A Tokyo court ruled Thursday that Apple did not infringe a Samsung patent, a small win for Apple in the continuing legal wrangling between the two companies.

The patent in question was related to a wireless transmission technology, according to Japanese media reports. Samsung spokesman Nam Ki Yung confirmed the lawsuit was filed in Japan against Apple for a "standards-related patent."

"We are disappointed by today's court decision. Following a thorough review of the ruling, we will take the measures necessary to protect our intellectual property rights," Samsung said in a statement.

An Apple spokesman in Tokyo said the company did not have a comment.

The decision by the Tokyo District Court follows a ruling in August that Samsung did not infringe a patent related to synching smartphones and tablets with media devices.

Several patent lawsuits between the two companies are still ongoing in the country. Japanese legal monetary awards are typically smaller than in other countries, and the courts sometimes issue separate rulings for individual patents in a single case.

Apple's iPhones and tablets are dominant in the Japanese market, far outselling rival devices from Samsung and domestic manufacturers.

Earlier this month in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose division a judge signaled she would like to put the second of two patent cases between the companies on hold while the first is resolved.

Apple is pursuing the two against Samsung before the same judge at the same time, with both accusing Samsung of violating patents in products including smartphones and tablets. Samsung denies the allegations and has filed countersuits of its own.

The iPhone maker scored a massive victory in August when a jury awarded it US$1.05 billion in damages, but it is still fighting to get an injunction on some Samsung products. Samsung has appealed that case.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Jay Alabaster

IDG News Service
Topics: Apple, consumer electronics, intellectual property, legal, hardware systems, Samsung Electronics, patent, smartphones, tablets
Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Compare & Save

Deals powered by WhistleOut
Use WhistleOut's technology to compare:
Mobile phone plans & deals
Mobile phone models
Mobile phone carriers
Broadband plans & deals
Broadband providers
Deals powered by WhistleOut
WhistleOut

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?