Second judge to join Apple-Samsung trial

It's the first time in federal court history that two judges have jointly heard a case at the same time in the same room

The patent trial in Australia between Apple and Samsung Electronics has become so complex that a second judge has been assigned to the case.

It's the first time in Australian federal court history that two judges will hear a case at the same time in the same courtroom, something both Apple and Samsung have agreed to, according to a court document filed Monday.

The document describes how the court plans to proceed with the case, launched by Apple in July 2011. The second judge, Justice David Yates, will sit with Justice Annabelle Claire Bennett through June 14, when Apple is scheduled to finish presenting its case.

Apple accuses Samsung of infringing a number of its patents related to touchscreen technology in Samsung's Galaxy smartphones and tablets.

Over the next three-and-a-half months, the judges will also hear claims by Samsung that four of Apple's patents should not have been granted in the first place. Under that "judicial review" application, Samsung argues that there are previously issued patents covering the same areas of innovation.

Separately, Samsung has filed a cross-claim against Apple alleging it violated patents related to 3G data transmission. It presented part of its case last year in Bennett's courtroom.

Samsung, which is required to license some of its 3G technology under fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms, contends that Apple refused to negotiate.

The world's number-one and number-two smartphone vendors show no sign of backing down in their litigation, which is playing out in courts worldwide. According to a court schedule, the Australian case is slated to continue through December.

In the U.S., Samsung is appealing a federal court jury's finding in August that it must pay Apple US$1.05 billion for infringing several Apple patents in its smartphones and tablets.

Apple also has a second patent case against Samsung in the U.S., filed in February 2012. It accuses Samsung of violating patents it holds in some of its newer products, which Samsung denies. Samsung has filed counterclaims against Apple in that case.

Send news tips and comments to jeremy_kirk@idg.com. Follow me on Twitter: @jeremy_kirk

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags Appleintellectual propertylegalSamsung Electronicspatentmobile

Struggling for Christmas presents this year? Check out our Christmas Gift Guide for some top tech suggestions and more.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Jeremy Kirk

IDG News Service

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?