Apple appeals denial of sales ban on Samsung phones

After winning a patent battle in August, Apple wants 26 Samsung phones off retailer shelves

Apple has appealed a judge's decision not to ban from sale in the U.S. 26 Samsung cell phones that were found to infringe on its patents.

A jury trial in August found that the Samsung phones had infringed on six Apple patents covering cell phone design and technology. The jury awarded Apple just over US$1 billion in damages, and Apple subsequently demanded that Samsung should be prohibited from selling the phones.

Many of the handsets have already been superseded by newer models but thousands of units of some models, including the Galaxy S II, are still with U.S. retailers.

After considering Apple's demands and arguments for an injunction, Judge Lucy Koh of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California decided the damage caused didn't warrant a sales ban.

"To the limited extent that Apple has been able to show that any of its harms were caused by Samsung's illegal conduct (in this case, only trade dress dilution), Apple has not established that the equities support an injunction," she wrote in the conclusion of her 23-page examination of Apple's demand.

That was on Monday.

Apple lodged its appeal on Thursday afternoon in a filing to Judge Koh's court in San Jose, where the battle against Samsung has been going on for more than a year.

"Notice is given that plaintiff Apple Inc. appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit from the Order Denying Motion for Permanent Injunction entered in this action on December 17, 2012 and from all other orders, rulings, findings, and conclusions underlying and related to that order," it said in the filing.

Martyn Williams covers mobile telecoms, Silicon Valley and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Follow Martyn on Twitter at @martyn_williams. Martyn's e-mail address is martyn_williams@idg.com

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Martyn Williams

IDG News Service
Topics: applications, telecommunication, ios, Android, iPhone, Civil lawsuits, mobile, Android OS, Apple, consumer electronics, intellectual property, Mobile OSes, legal, Samsung Electronics, patent, smartphones
Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Compare & Save

Deals powered by WhistleOut
WhistleOut

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?