Court orders patents in Apple-HTC deal to be made public

Only the pricing and royalty terms of the agreement were allowed to be sealed

Apple's patent license agreement with HTC will not be put entirely under seal, except for the pricing and royalty terms, a court in California ordered in a patent infringement lawsuit between Samsung Electronics and Apple.

Judge Lucy H. Koh of U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose division ordered Monday that the patents covered under the agreement will not be sealed. The Judge was ruling on a motion to seal the entire agreement between Apple and HTC.

A motion to seal before a court requests that documents and evidence should be prevented from being available to the general public.

"There are compelling reasons to seal pricing and royalty terms, as they may place the parties to the agreement at a disadvantage in future negotiations, but there is nothing in the remainder of the agreement that presents a sufficient risk of competitive harm to justify keeping it from the public," Judge Koh wrote in her order.

Apple and HTC announced last month that they had settled all their outstanding patent disputes in a settlement that includes a 10-year agreement under which the companies will license current and future patents from each other. The terms of the settlement were kept confidential and not disclosed.

The court ordered HTC last month to produce without delay an unredacted version of the agreement, after Samsung said it was relevant to its patent infringement dispute with Apple as it almost certainly covers at least some of the patents in the suit.

Apple's willingness to license patents in the suit may undermine its claim of irreparable harm and demonstrate that monetary remedies are adequate, Samsung said in a filing last month. Apple's motion for a permanent injunction on some Samsung smartphones comes up for hearing on Thursday.

HTC, however, said in a filing that the compensation terms in its agreement with Apple are highly "competition-sensitive."

The agreement would be made available only for viewing by the attorneys in the patent lawsuit, Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal wrote in an order last month.

Judge Koh said in her order that the court agrees that the Nov. 11 license agreement between Apple and HTC may be relevant to the permanent injunction analysis, and that Samsung could not have presented it earlier. Accordingly, she granted Samsung's motion for leave to file the HTC license.

Tags htcconsumer electronicsintellectual propertyAndroidlegaliPhonepatentsmartphonessamsungApple

Recommended

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

John Ribeiro

IDG News Service

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?