Judge orders Oracle to give Google $1 million for court costs

But Google had originally asked for $4 million, including e-discovery expenses

A judge on Tuesday ordered Oracle to pay about US$1 million to Google for costs related to the companies' lawsuit over the Android mobile OS, but the ruling is only a partial victory for Google, which had originally sought about $4 million.

Judge William Alsup rejected Google's demand that Oracle also pay $2.9 million for costs related to document discovery, calling the search giant's arguments "unpersuasive" and also accusing it of padding the bill.

"The problem with Google's e-discovery bill of costs is that many of [the] item-line descriptions seemingly bill for 'intellectual effort' such as organizing, searching, and analyzing the discovery documents," Alsup said in the ruling filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. "Most egregious are attempts to bill costs for 'conferencing,' 'prepare for and participate in kickoff call,' and communications with co-workers, other vendors, and clients. These are non-taxable intellectual efforts."

But Alsup did agree that Oracle should pay out roughly $1 million to cover Google's share of fees paid to a court-appointed expert witness for the trial.

Oracle sued Google in August 2010, alleging that Android violated patents and copyrights Oracle holds on the Java programming language. Google was largely exonerated in the case, which concluded earlier this year, but Oracle plans to appeal. Oracle had originally sought billions in damages from Google.

As the prevailing party in the initial case, Google was able to seek recovery of costs.

An Oracle spokeswoman didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Chris Kanaracus covers enterprise software and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Chris' email address is Chris_Kanaracus@idg.com

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Chris Kanaracus

IDG News Service

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?