Apple's curved glass and aluminium iPhone rejected over cost and comfort issues

Apple v Samsung court filings reveal why Apple abandoned early iPhone prototypes

Apple's earliest iPhone prototypes were unearthed during the trial between Apple and Samsung last week, and further investigation into older court filings from the case have revealed some of the reasons behind Apple's decisions for the design of its smartphone.

Networkworld's Yoni Heisler reports that Samsung's attorney has questioned former Industrial Design Creative Lead at Apple, Douglas Satzger, who is now the Vice President of Industrial Design at Intel. Satzger worked on the original iPhone, the iPhone 3G and the iPhone 3GS.

Satzger told Samsung's attorney that Apple's industrial design team had a strong interest in developing an iPhone with shaped glass on both the front and the back of the device.

The reason Apple decided against this design for the iPhone was because it would be too expensive to make. "The technology in shaping the glass, the cost relative to shaping the glass at the time, and some of the design features of this specific shape were not liked," Satzger explained.

Apple also considered an iPhone that looks much like the early iPod mini, as seen in the photograph below.

"My recollection of it was that to get the extruded aluminium design that was applied to the iPod to work for the iPhone, there were too many added features to allow it to be comfortable and to work properly" Satzger explained when asked what the problem with the design was that made Apple decide against it. "If you put an iPod up to your ear, the sharp edges, because of the processes, aren't comfortable, and you can't get antennas to work properly in a fully enclosed metal jacket. So each one of those things needed to apply other features that started," he said.

See also: Everything we know about the iPhone 5 launch date, specifications, features

Related:

Trial with Samsung reveals Apple's 7in iPad vision, 'Purple Project' Apple, Samsung wage battle both in and out of court Samsung: Apple pushed expert witnesses to change their minds Apple v Samsung: day by day account of patent trial Apple v Samsung highlights insanity of tech patents Judge rejects Apple's punishment against Samsung

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Ashleigh Allsopp

Macworld U.K.

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?