Judge declines to eject Google's 'fair use' defense from Android trial

Judge Alsup's ruling means the issue of fair use will likely be put to a new jury

Oracle was dealt a minor setback in its lawsuit against Google on Wednesday when a judge denied its motion to toss out one of Google's key defenses against copyright infringement.

A jury on Monday found Google had infringed Oracle's copyrights on the APIs (application programming interfaces) in Java, but was unable to agree on whether that infringement was protected by "fair use," which allows for copying under certain circumstances.

With the jury hung on that issue, Oracle had asked the judge in the case, William Alsup, to rule as a matter of law that Google's fair use defense was invalid. Such rulings are granted when a judge, having heard all the evidence in a case, concludes there is no question left for a jury to decide.

Alsup ruled from the bench Wednesday that he was denying the motion. "I don't think it would be right to rule in favor of Oracle," he said.

It doesn't mean Google has escaped liability for copyright infringement, but it means the question of fair use will probably now go to another jury. That means a partial retrial of the case is more likely.

Alsup made his ruling from the bench after two hours of intense argument from trial lawyers for Google and Oracle. The arguments also touched on a bigger, more important issue in the case -- that of whether the Java APIs can be copyrighted under U.S. law at all. The judge said he is "working hard on that" question and did not yet make a ruling.

Alsup did rule in Oracle's favor on two smaller issues. Google had asked Alsup to overturn the jury's finding that it infringed Oracle's copyright by copying nine lines of code in Java known as the rangeCheck function, and by copying documentation that accompanies the Java APIs. Alsup denied both motions, saying the jury reached those decisions on reasonable grounds.

While Alsup decides how to deal with Monday's partial verdict on copyright infringement, the jury has already moved onto the next phase of the trial, to assess Oracle's patent claims. They heard testimony on the patent issues Wednesday morning from Google's Android chief, Andy Rubin, from other engineers, and from one of Oracle's hired experts.

There are only two patents at issue in the trial, however, one of which expires at the end of this year, and Oracle's copyright claims are considered more significant.

Oracle sued Google in 2010, accusing it of infringing its Java patents and copyrights in Google's Android OS. Google says it built Android using publically available Java code and by creating a clean room version of Sun's Java virtual machine.

The trial is a complicated one with several overlapping threads. Separate from the arguments Wednesday, Google filed a motion last night asking that the proceedings be declared a mistrial, on the grounds that the issues of infringement and fair use must be decided together, not by separate juries.

Alsup has yet to rule on that motion but has done all he can throughout the case to avoid a retrial.

"I hate to even contemplate the idea of another trial, but if it comes to that, that's the way it will have to be," he said at one point.

James Niccolai covers data centers and general technology news for IDG News Service. Follow James on Twitter at @jniccolai. James's e-mail address is james_niccolai@idg.com

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

James Niccolai

IDG News Service
Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Compare & Save

Deals powered by WhistleOut
Use WhistleOut's technology to compare:
Mobile phone plans & deals
Mobile phone models
Mobile phone carriers
Broadband plans & deals
Broadband providers
Deals powered by WhistleOut
WhistleOut

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?