Oracle demands January trial in Google-Android case

But Google maintains it might need to be delayed until July due to scheduling problems

Google and Oracle continue to differ over when their lawsuit over alleged Java intellectual property violations in the Android mobile OS should begin, according to a joint filing the companies made late Monday in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Oracle referred to the "irreparable harm" being caused to Java by "the continued migration of device manufacturers and application developers from Java to Android" in requesting the trial begin on Jan. 20 or 23, after the scheduled Jan. 19 submission of an expert's damages report.

"For instance, Amazon's newly-released Kindle Fire tablet is based on Android, while prior versions of the Kindle were Java-based," Oracle added. "Android has been gaining in other areas as well, with Android-based set-top boxes and even televisions appearing this year. These are markets where Java has traditionally been strong but is now losing ground to Android."

While Google has argued that the number of Java developers actually grew since Oracle filed suit, many of them are focusing on Android and "not for licensed Java implementations," Oracle said.

For its part, Google has "no interest in delaying resolution of this case any longer than necessary," but a January start is not workable given various scheduling issues, the company said in the joint statement. In fact, it may be "difficult to conduct trial before July 2012," Google said.

Oracle's own public figures show that there are 2.5 million more Java developers since the lawsuit was filed, Google added. On one hand, "Oracle contends that many of these developers are writing for Android, with no benefit to Oracle," Google added. "But this is inconsistent with the fact that Oracle touts these figures."

Oracle sued Google in August 2010, alleging that Android violated a number of patents and copyrights it holds on Java, which Oracle gained control of through the acquisition of Sun Microsystems. Google has admitted no wrongdoing.

The court has proposed splitting the trial into a number of phases. While Google is in support of such a move, Oracle has opposed doing so on grounds it would result in redundant testimony.

It's possible that some resolution on the trial's start date and format could come on Wednesday, when the joint filing is discussed at a scheduled pretrial conference.

Chris Kanaracus covers enterprise software and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Chris's e-mail address is Chris_Kanaracus@idg.com

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags Languages and standardsapplication developmentopen sourceintellectual propertylegalCivil lawsuitspatentsoftwareOracleAndroid OSGoogle

Struggling for Christmas presents this year? Check out our Christmas Gift Guide for some top tech suggestions and more.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Chris Kanaracus

IDG News Service

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?