Apple suppliers accused of environmental damage

Apple is at fault for using suppliers that watchdogs allege pollute the environment

Environmental groups in China criticized Apple on Wednesday, alleging that it is employing suppliers that are damaging the environment and threatening the lives of residents. Apple, however, maintains the company has been vigilant in ensuring all its suppliers follow environmental safety requirements.

The watchdog groups, which include the Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs, released a report after conducting a five-month investigation on electronic suppliers that they believe are used by Apple.

In the Chinese city of Kunshan, accessory manufacturer Kaedar Electronics and printed circuit board maker Unimicron have allegedly been discharging waste water and harmful gas from their plants, causing nearby residents to worry about their health, according to the report.

In April, the environmental groups spoke with the residents. "Over the ten-year period, many people have fallen sick, with a sharp increase in the village's cancer rates," the report claims. Since 2007, more than nine people have suffered or died from cancer in the village, which has a population of less than 60.

Meiko Electronics, a Japanese company that builds printed circuit boards, was also found to have polluted a lake in the Chinese city of Wuhan with copper and nickel, according to tests carried out by the environmental groups in April. The lake directly feeds into the Yangtze River, which is China's longest river.

Apple declined to say if the companies named were in fact its suppliers. But in a statement, the company reiterated its commitment to achieving safe environmental standards.

Apple does this by regularly conducting audits and working with suppliers to correct violations, according to the company's 2011 supplier responsibility progress report. In 2010, the company audited 127 facilities and found that 89 percent of them had waste water management practices in compliance with Apple's requirements.

The same audits, however, found that only 69 percent of the facilities were in compliance with air emission management standards. Only 70 percent of the facilities were in compliance for environmental permits and reporting. When violations are found, Apple requires the supplier to complete plans to resolve the problem 90 days after the audit.

Kaedar Electronics, Unimicron and Meiko could not be reached for immediate comment.

The environmental groups have criticized Apple before. In January, the groups released a report providing cases of where Apple suppliers violated environmental regulations in China. The report also pointed to an incident involving workers poisoned by poor working conditions at a supplier's factory.

Following the report, Apple restated its pledge to provide safe working conditions among its suppliers.

The environmental groups' newest report also investigated Foxconn Technology, which builds iPhones and iPads. One of the company's industrial parks in the Chinese city of Taiyuan emits air pollution that contains irritants, causing residents to complain. Following local government action, Foxconn halted part of their production line at the industrial park, according to the report.

Foxconn said in a statement the company is committed to abiding by the laws to ensure the environment's protection. "We work closely with local government and environmental protection officials to monitor the performance of each and every one of our facilities," the company said.

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags Foxconn ElectronicsElectronics manufacturingAppleUnimicronHealth and safetyMeiko ElectronicsKaedar Electronicsenvironment

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Michael Kan

IDG News Service

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?