Oracle asks court to force Motorola to testify

Oracle says Motorola has been stonewalling its requests for information about its Android implementation

Oracle has asked an Illinois court to force Motorola to hand over information relevant to Oracle's lawsuit against Google.

On Friday, Oracle filed a motion in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois asking the court to order Motorola to turn over information and offer an executive who can testify about its implementation of Android.

Oracle wants to see the code that Motorola has downloaded from Google's http://android.git.kernel.org website, as well as any changes Motorola has made to that code. Oracle also wants to see how Motorola uses the Android dx tool, which is one of the functions that Oracle accuses Google of copying. It also wants the chance to interview a Motorola witness.

The information will show whether Motorola uses the infringing technology, Oracle said. "Deposition is necessary to determine if Motorola uses the accused technology in developing applications for Android, because Motorola has not produced any documents regarding its internal application development," Oracle wrote.

Oracle claims it has been asking Motorola to produce the information and a witness since April 12, to no avail. "Motorola has offered no good excuse for its refusal to provide a witness in response to Oracle's proper subpoena," Oracle said in the motion. "Motorola has simply stonewalled, citing scheduling conflicts."

The phone maker may be dragging its feet because it hopes Google will shield it from becoming involved in the Oracle lawsuit or because it expects Oracle to soon start negotiations over a licensing fee, Florian Mueller, a patent expert, wrote in a blog post on Friday. He expects the Illinois court to comply, forcing Motorola to turn over the requested information and make a witness available.

Motorola did not immediately reply to a request for comment.

Oracle has until Aug. 15 for discovery, which is the period during which it can uncover evidence for its case.

Oracle filed the lawsuit against Google last year in California, charging the search giant with infringing Java patents in Android. Since it acquired Sun Microsystems, Oracle has controlled Java.

Motorola, which only makes phones using the Android operating system, has been attacked on several fronts for its use of the software. Microsoft has sued the handset maker in federal court and the U.S. International Trade Commission over its Android phones. Apple has also sued Motorola, charging patent infringement in its Android phones.

Google licenses Android to phone makers with no assurances of protection if other companies sue for patent infringement. That means other Android phone makers, including Samsung and HTC, also have been the subject of patent-infringement suits for their Android phones.

A jury trial for Oracle's suit against Google is scheduled to begin Oct. 31.

Nancy Gohring covers mobile phones and cloud computing for The IDG News Service. Follow Nancy on Twitter at @idgnancy. Nancy's e-mail address is Nancy_Gohring@idg.com

Tags MotorolaGoogleconsumer electronicsintellectual propertyAndroidlegalpatentsmartphonesOracle

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Nancy Gohring

IDG News Service

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?