SEO peddlers see value in Google's +1

Want some Google +1's? Buy 'em.

Search engine optimization companies have started targeting Google's +1 feature -- you can now pay companies to "+1" your website.

SEO companies, such as SEO Shop, are now offering packages of Google +1's. SEO Shop sells its +1's at Plussem.com, where you can purchase 50 +1's for $10, 250 +1's for $30, and 2,000 +1's for $170. SEO Shop has, naturally, gone to great lengths to conceal its activities from Google itself.

This isn't the first time we've heard of companies "selling social." In the past, we've seen companies that have sold packages of Facebook friends and Twitter followers -- for a price, of course.

The Value of +1

Google's +1 was announced back in March, presumably as a way for the company to combat the ever-present Facebook "Like" button. When users "+1" a website, they are essentially telling their connected friends that they "like" and "recommend" that site.

Initially, Google +1's only appeared on Google itself, but in June the company rolled out the +1 button to the entire Web. This expansion indicates Google could be ready to use +1 data to tweak its rankings -- after all, it seems plausible that the search giant would be interested in staying current with trending topics.

To ensure you get what you pay for, SEO Shop says that all of the +1's you purchase come from real people with verified accounts (verified through a manual process). Each +1 also comes from a unique IP address, and +1's are spread out over several days. In other words, Google will have a hard time discerning which +1's are legitimate, and which ones are generated by a company such as Plussem.

A Shady Practice

How Plussem gets all of your +1's isn't too clear. The Atlantic's Alexis Madrigal writes that the outfit is paying "a ton of very poor people with Internet access in developing countries a tiny slice of the money you would have to spend on traditional marketing." While this is probably speculation, I imagine it's also pretty close to the truth.

Paying for +1's is also a violation of Google's +1 policies. According to Google's +1 website, "Publishers should not promote prizes, monies, or monetary equivalents in exchange for +1 Button clicks."

I think it's pretty safe to say that the only reason SEO Shop is undertaking an effort such as this is because of the success of Google+. Before Google+, there really wasn't much of a value in gaming Google's social recommendation system -- but now, with +1 playing such a significant role in the hottest new social network, it's valuable. And, of course, on top of all that it (might) be connected to search relevancy.

Is it kind of scummy that SEO Shop is doing this? You bet, but there is money to be made in getting companies good search placement. The onus now appears on Google to figure out methods to detect these false +1's, or the system might end up just like Digg, Reddit, and others, who have seen similar spam issues with their recommendation systems.

For more tech news and commentary, follow Ed on Twitter at @edoswald and on Facebook.

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags GooglewebGoogle+social networksinternet

Struggling for Christmas presents this year? Check out our Christmas Gift Guide for some top tech suggestions and more.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Ed Oswald

PC World (US online)

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?