PCI Council says mobile payment apps can meet security standard

Guidance can help merchants, tool vendors move on; no ruling yet on apps that run on popular consumer devices

The PCI Security Standards Council has released its long-awaited guidance on how mobile payment acceptance applications can meet PCI standards .

The council today listed the types of mobile applications now measured by the security standards, and which types require further review.

The new document, dubbed Which Applications Are Eligible for PA-DSS Validation? A Guiding Checklist ( Download PDF ), is designed to let merchants know whether the mobile payment applications they are using could meet today's PCI specifications.

The document separates mobile payment applications into three separate categories.

The first two categories -- applications that operate on mobile devices already approved for use by the council and apps designed to run on purpose-built, dedicated mobile payment devices -- can meet current PCI security standards, the council said.

The third category, payment applications running on popular consumer mobile devices such as smartphones, tablets and PDAs, face further review to determine whether they can be eligible for PCI status, said Bob Russo, general manager of the PCI Security Standards Council.

"Mobile is coming out at Mach 5 with its hair on fire," Russo reasoned. "Unfortunately there are no standards around any of this stuff."

While many merchants are anxious to use mobile payment applications, the speed at which the technology is evolving makes it difficult to establish standards, he said. He compared the situation to the release of drugs that "the FDA has not had a chance to test and approve. You got to be very careful," Russo said.

The Payment Card Industry rules require that all hardware and software technologies used to accept, process, and transmit debit and credit card transactions meet a set of prescribed security controls.

Merchants that use payment applications that have not been formally certified as meeting Payment Applications Data Security Standards (PA-DSS) standards are deemed to be non-compliant.

Today's announcement marks the first time the PCI council has said that mobile payment applications can be eligible to meet its standards requirements.

The council had previously maintained that it had to conduct a lengthy review of mobile communications devices and payment applications before making a decision on whether the emerging technologies could meet its standards.

Jim Huguelet, an independent PCI analyst based in Bolingbrook, Ill., noted that because the PCI decision is incomplete, developers of mobile payment applications for consumer devices and the merchants who use them have been left in a "very tenuous position."

Today's update from the PCI council "will indeed help some vendors and merchants now - as opposed to waiting until later this year when comprehensive guidance on mobile becomes available," he added.

He did note that the council's continued silence on whether payment applications can safely be used on consumer devices is disappointing, he said. "For all intents and purposes, the area where the vast majority of interest lies must wait until later this year for guidance," he said.

The incomplete announcement, he noted, raises interesting questions, such as: "Are they trying to say that applications like Google Wallet are not within the scope of PCI?," he said.

Jaikumar Vijayan covers data security and privacy issues, financial services security and e-voting for Computerworld. Follow Jaikumar on Twitter at @jaivijayan , or subscribe to Jaikumar's RSS feed . His e-mail address is jvijayan@computerworld.com .

Read more about security in Computerworld's Security Topic Center.

Tags Mobile and Wirelessconsumer electronicstelecommunicationsecurityPhonessmartphonesmobilePCI Security Standards Council

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Jaikumar Vijayan

Computerworld (US)

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?