Kerry, McCain introduced online privacy bill

Privacy advocates say the bill would allow business as usual for data collection online

Two high-profile U.S. senators have introduced legislation designed to give consumers more control over what information about them is collected online, but privacy advocates said the bill will do little to curb wide-spread data-collection practices now in place.

Senators John Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat, and John McCain, an Arizona Republican, introduced the Commercial Privacy Bill of Rights Act Tuesday. The bill would require Web-based businesses that collect consumer information to give clear notice about the data collection and allow consumers to opt out.

The bill would require Web-based businesses to collect only as much information as necessary to complete a transaction or deliver a service, and it would require collectors to take security measures to protect the data.

"John and I start with a bedrock belief that protecting Americans' personal, private information is vital to making the Information Age everything it should be," Kerry said in a statement. "Americans have a right to decide how their information is collected, used, and distributed and businesses deserve the certainty that comes with clear guidelines."

The bill will help assure Web users that their information is secure, while allowing the information economy to continue to "thrive," Kerry added. "This is a win for bipartisanship, a win for consumers, a win for the Internet and a win for businesses online and off," he said. "Most importantly, in a Washington where partisanship and division too often triumph, it's a victory for common sense."

The bill allows businesses to market and advertise to all consumers, while businesses that have no relationship with consumers are prohibited from collecting or sharing private their information, McCain added.

Collection and sharing by businesses with no relationship to the consumer is a practice that "American consumers reject as an unreasonable invasion of privacy," he said in a statement. "Consumers want to shop, browse and share information in an environment that is respectful of their personal information."

But members of privacy groups Consumer Watchdog, the Center for Digital Democracy (CDD) and Consumer Action said they couldn't support the bill. The legislation would take away some policy-making authority from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and would take away the right of consumers to file lawsuits against companies for privacy violations, they said. The legislation also has no requirement for a national do-not-track mechanism that consumers can sign up for, and has an exemption for Facebook's data collection, critics said.

"The bill will not protect consumer privacy, who confront the ever-expanding consumer surveillance system," said Jeffrey Chester, CDD's executive director. "It is full of loopholes and definitional problems ... that basically sanction the existing data-collection marketplace."

The privacy advocates praised McCain and Kerry for raising the online privacy issue, but said the bill falls short of their expectations. The loopholes in the bill "could leave consumers feeling that they're far more protected than they are," said John Simpson, consumer advocate at Consumer Watchdog.

The bill may limit the FTC from charging online businesses with unfair or deceptive practices in privacy cases, Simpson added. If the bill was law, the FTC may not have been able to enter into a March settlement with Google over privacy complaints about its social-media Buzz product, he said.

Several tech trade groups and companies voiced support for the legislation, however.

The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, a tech-focused think tank, praised the bill for balancing privacy rights with the "robust commercial Internet ecosystem."

Verizon Communications called the bill a "great start" toward privacy rules, and Hewlett-Packard praised the bill for "providing businesses with the opportunity to enter into a robust self-regulatory program."

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's e-mail address is

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags Information Technology and Innovation Foundatione-commerceJohn McCainJohn KerryCenter for Digital DemocracylegislationinternetprivacyHewlett-PackardFacebookConsumer ActionJeffrey Chesterverizon businesssecurityJohn SimpsongovernmentVerizon CommunicationsadvertisingU.S. SenateU.S. Federal Trade CommissionConsumer Watchdog

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Grant Gross

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Best Deals on Good Gear Guide

Latest News Articles


GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy


First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni


For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell


The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi


The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott


My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?