Winklevoss twins v. Facebook: Case closed

An appeals court judge ruled that the Winklevoss twins will have to settle with $160 million from their Facebook dispute

The Winklevoss twins will have to settle with $160 million from their dispute with Facebook, an appeals court has said. The twins' epic argument with Mark Zuckerberg over the ownership of Facebook -- dramatized in the Oscar-winning movie "The Social Network" -- has to finally come to an end, the judge said.

Facebook agreed in 2008 to settle the dispute over who came up with the idea for the social network by giving Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss $20 million in cash and partial ownership of Facebook. As Facebook is now valuated at around $50 billion, the settlement is now estimated to be worth more than $160 million.

"The Winklevosses are not the first parties bested by a competitor who then seek to gain through litigation what they were unable to achieve in the marketplace," wrote Chief Judge Alex Kozinski in the decision. "And the courts might have obliged, had the Winklevosses not settled their dispute and signed a release of all claims against Facebook."

If you missed "The Social Network," the original case against Facebook (and Zuckerberg) was brought in 2004 by the Winklevosses, along with their partner Divya Narendra. The twins and Narendra were the founders of ConnectU (originally called Harvard Connection), also a social networking site.

In 2003, ConnectU hired Zuckerberg to write some code for their website, and a few weeks later Zuckerberg launched thefacebook.com. The twins claimed Zuckerberg copied their idea and used source code for his own site.

But after a $65 million settlement in 2008, the Winklevoss twins were not satisfied with their payout from Zuckerberg, so in December 2010 the twins filed a new lawsuit seeking further compensation - leading to the judge's ruling.

Follow Daniel Ionescu and Today @ PCWorld on Twitter

Tags Internet-based applications and serviceslegal issuesinternetsocial mediasocial networksFacebook

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Daniel Ionescu

PC World (US online)

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?