Microsoft calls IE9-Firefox 4 comparisons 'misleading'

Wait until June, after Windows Update's pushed IE9, then talk share, exec argues
  • (Computerworld (US))
  • — 01 April, 2011 04:02

Faced with rival Firefox 4's record-setting launch, Microsoft this week argued that it's unfair to grade its Internet Explorer 9 (IE9) against Mozilla's newest browser.

"With Internet Explorer 9, Firefox 4, and Chrome 10 all hitting their final releases recently, drawing instant comparisons around downloads or initial usage is a natural temptation, but unfortunately you can't do it quite yet," said Ryan Gavin, senior director of IE marketing.

A day after IE9's March 14 launch, Microsoft touted the 2.3 million copies that had been downloaded in the first 24 hours. A week later, Mozilla shipped Firefox 4, logging 7.1 million downloads the first day, another 8.75 million the next. The latter exceeded the 2008 record of 8 million that Mozilla set with Firefox 3 in 2008 for the most software downloads in a 24-hour period.

But in a Tuesday blog post , Gavin contended that differences in how the browser makers offer upgrades makes early comparisons meaningless, and that IE9 will only get rolling next month, when Microsoft enables Automatic Updates on its Windows Update service.

Thus far, Microsoft has pushed IE9 via Windows Update only to users already running the beta or release candidate builds of the browser.

"In the case of Firefox 4 and Chrome 10 their update mechanisms are turned on as part of their initial release to web (RTW)," claimed Gavin.

That's not entirely true.

Although Google updates the "stable" build of its Chrome silently in the background -- including Chrome 10, which launched three weeks ago -- Mozilla has not yet switched on an upgrade offer for users running the older Firefox 3.6 browser.

Instead, Firefox 3.6 users must first update to the newest version of that edition, then manually check for an update to see the Firefox 4 offer.

Traditionally, Mozilla kicks in the offer -- which it calls a "major upgrade" -- 60 to 90 days after the launch of a new browser. But a major upgrade offer for Firefox 4 may appear "soon," a Mozilla spokeswoman said Wednesday.

Because IE9 won't reach all users until June when the Windows Update offer wraps up, usage share comparisons between it and Firefox -- comparisons that Computerworld and others made this week -- are unjustified, said Gavin.

"The net of all this is that any comparison of browser share adoption at this point is premature at best, and misleading at worst," Gavin said. "In a few months, we'll be better placed to look at the share of the latest browser versions and get a sense for relative progress and adoption."

According to Web metric company Net Applications, Firefox 4's average share for its first nine days was 3.2 per cent, while IE9's in that same stretch was only 1.1 per cent. On Wednesday, Firefox 4 passed the four per cent share mark for the first time; the same day, IE9 stood at 1.4 per cent.

It's not surprising that Firefox 4's share trumped IE9's. Unlike IE9, Mozilla's browser runs on Windows XP, Mac and Linux, operating systems that Microsoft's program doesn't support.

It was Microsoft's decision, however, to support IE9 on only Windows Vista and Windows 7, versions which collectively account for slightly more than a third of all copies of Windows now in use. The company has said it did not want to develop for what it called the "lowest common denominator," the 10-year-old Windows XP, because, said Gavin two weeks ago, "That's not what developers need to move the Web forward."

Gavin used that to make another point in his dispute with comparisons, arguing that since IE9 only runs on Vista and Windows 7 -- and is especially targeted at the latter -- its market share should be calculated solely on its use among Windows Vista and Windows 7 users.

"Adoption on Windows 7 is what we care about most," said Gavin. "Other browsers support other platforms, so if you want to draw comparisons you really need to take account of addressable base. With IE9, you essentially need to multiple by a factor of almost 3x to account for the difference in current addressable base."

Microsoft's made that case before, and in fact has gone so far as to claim that IE9 is the best browser for Windows because rivals "dilute" their energies on other operating systems.

Net Applications does not usually disclose granular data on its browser usage share numbers that would show how IE9 fares among Windows Vista and Windows 7 owners only, or how competitors like Firefox and Chrome match up on those operating systems.

The analytics company will release its March browser share data early Friday morning.

Gregg Keizer covers Microsoft, security issues, Apple, Web browsers and general technology breaking news for Computerworld. Follow Gregg on Twitter at @gkeizer or subscribe to Gregg's RSS feed . His e-mail address is gkeizer@computerworld.com .

Read more about browsers in Computerworld's Browsers Topic Center.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Gregg Keizer

Computerworld (US)
Topics: applications, Microsoft, browsers, Windows, software, internet, operating systems, mozilla
Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Compare & Save

Deals powered by WhistleOut
WhistleOut

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?