Cybercriminals selling exploit-as-a-service kit

Taking a page from the cloud services playbook, cybercriminals offer exploit kits plus hosting and metered pricing

Cybercriminals are taking a page from the software-as-a-service playbook: they're now selling exploit kits complete with hosting services, with customers paying for the length of time the exploits are actively infecting computers.

The kits offer several kinds of exploits, or sequences of codes that can take advantage of software vulnerabilities in order to deliver malware. Researchers from Seculert have found that at least a couple of these kits -- Incognito 2.0 and Bomba -- offer their own Web hosting as well as a Web-based management interface.

The new business model makes it easier for cybercriminals who may have trouble securing so-called "bulletproof" hosting, or ISPs willing to host malware servers, said Aviv Raff, CTO and cofounder of Seculert. The company specializes in a cloud-based service that alerts its customers to new malware, exploits and other cyberthreats.

The whole package is intended for criminals who want large numbers of hacked computers running Microsoft Windows. Once the computers are hacked, the machines can be used to steal personal data, send spam, for conducting denial-of-service attacks or other purposes.

It's also cheaper. The criminal clients pay for only the time that their exploits are live, meaning if for any reason the ISPs shut down the rogue servers, they don't have to pay, Raff said. He estimated the malware hosting and exploit service to cost between US$100 to $200 a month.

"This is all managed by the 'service provider,'" Raff said. "You as a customer only pay for the time the exploits are hosted. We don't have the exact numbers, but like any other 'cloud-based' service, it's reasonable that the account is much more affordable than buying the kit and hosting it."

The clients must provide their own malware for the exploits to deliver. They must also hack websites in order to redirected victims to the crimeware servers hosted by Incognito's operators. When a potential victim visits one of the infected websites, an iframe is displayed that brings in content from Incognito servers that starts trying to hack the machines with various exploits.

So far, Seculert counted about 8,000 legitimate websites that have been hacked and are pulling exploits hosted by Incognito. Some victims are infected when they go to those sites through normal browsing, Raff said. But the hackers have also used spam campaigns to try to draw people to infected sites.

One of those recent spam messages noticed by Seculert purported to be a support message from Twitter, which encouraged people to click on a link that was supposedly a video from near the ailing Japanese nuclear reactors in Fukushima damaged in the tsunami earlier this month. If a person clicked on the link, no video was displayed, and a Trojan downloader was installed on the computer if it had a software vulnerability.

Incognito 2.0 provides a Web-based management interface where clients can check how many computers have been infected and what type of exploit was used, Raff said. Seculert posted screenshots on its blog.

Incognito 2.0 seems to be a growing business: Seculert's researchers found after analyzing its infrastructure that at least 30 clients were using it to install everything from the Zeus banking Trojan to fake antivirus software to generic Trojan dowloaders that can install other malware on an infected computer.

At least 150,000 machines were infected during a two-week period in January. About 70 per cent of those computers were infected using an exploit for a vulnerability for the Java runtime environment, with 20 percent infected via an Adobe Reader vulnerability.

Send news tips and comments to jeremy_kirk@idg.com

Tags intrusionsecuritydata breachIdentity fraud / theftExploits / vulnerabilitiesSeculertfraudmalware

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Jeremy Kirk

IDG News Service

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?