'Anonymous' targets copyright cops

AFACT represents a number of content producers such as movie and television studios and aims to reduce the impact of copyright infringement in Australia

The loose-knit confederation of internet activists who organise under the banner "Anonymous" appeared to hit Australia again this morning, with Operation Payback targeting a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack against the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT).

AFACT represents a number of content producers such as movie and television studios and aims to reduce the impact of copyright infringement in Australia. The group has been involved in a high-profile lawsuit against national broadband provider iiNet. DDoS attacks attempt to cripple internet infrastructure through delivering a flood of data to servers and network infrastructure.

"Realise, you are forcing our hand by ignoring us. You forced us to DDoS when you ignored the people, ATTACKED the people, LIED TO THE PEOPLE! You are forcing us to take more drastic action as you ignore us, THE PEOPLE, now," an individual claiming to represent Anonymous stated in a letter released before the attacks.

Anonymous is well known in Australia's technology sector for what appeared to be several similar DDoS attacks earlier this year against Federal Government websites and other communications systems in protest against Labor's mandatory internet filtering policy.

Three and half hours after the attacks were timed to begin on the AFACT site, AFACT and hosting partner Netregistry experienced the effects -- with the copyright group's site going down at 8AM this morning. This story was broken, to our knowledge, by iTNews.

"The attack consisted of 60,000 active HTTP connections and an approximate 100 megabits per second of additional bandwidth being transferred from this particular cluster where the site was located," a Netregistry spokesperson said, adding that the attacks mainly originated from Chile and Columbia.

"The AFACT website was offline due to Netregistry engineers suspending it as the target of the attack. All other sites on the shared infrastructure remained operational, albeit with some service degradation," they added. Anonymous had planned to attack AFACT for at least 12 hours.

"We’re delighted to say our infrastructure proved to be highly resilient in the face of a particularly heavy and determined DDoS attack. All affected websites remained online and were back to full performance reasonably quickly, only experiencing intermittent connection problems throughout the day," said Netregistry chief executive Larry Bloch.

"Of course, the very nature of a DDoS attack means prevention is impossible. However, a combination of our cloud hosting infrastructure and active management dramatically reduced the potential impact for thousands of affected businesses."

"This incident vindicates our multi-million dollar ten year investment in our shared cloud hosting infrastructure. It is remarkable that a shared cloud hosting service costing our clients around $10 per month withstood one of the hacker community's most determined, coordinated DDoS attacks without failing."

The AFACT attacks also affected other Netregistry sites - although an exact figure on how many sites was affected hasn't been released. Sites affected ranged from small businesses to government sites. The hosting company posted a statement on its website for customers to make them aware that the organisation knew what was going on and what measures were been taken.

"Impact to the cluster during the peak of the attack resulted in performance degradation to websites. However, the unique cloud hosting infrastructure pioneered by Netregistry was able to scale up and carry the additional load without failing," said a Netregistry spokesperson. "There were some minor ancillary issues discovered during the attack that affected our infrastructure, but these were promptly resolved as they were identified with minimal customer impact."

"No loss of data occured, the services resumed operation once the attackers IP ranges were blocked. Email was delayed in delivery, however no bounces were caused by the issue," the site added. The Netregistry site stated that "Zeus cluster (PHP clients not utilising Apache)" had issues.

AFACT executive director Neil Gane said that this was the first attack of its kind experienced by AFCT. The executive was unable to comment on the estimated damage the attacks caused or what measures AFACT would take to identify the attackers and if they would be referring to authorities. The organisation's site is back up at time of publication.

The attacks on AFACT follow an onslaught of attacks on Stichting Bescherming Rechten Entertainment Industrie Nederland, the Motion Picture Association of Australia, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), the British Phonographic Industry (BPI) and Aiplex Software an Indian software firm that was hired to launch a DDoS attack on peer to peer hub the Pirate Bay.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Renai LeMay

PC World
Topics: Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT)
Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Compare & Save

Deals powered by WhistleOut
WhistleOut

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?