Virtual machines need defragging too

An Osterman Research white paper argues for defragmenting virtual machines

Weighing in on a seemingly perennial question asked by system administrators, IT analysts Osterman Research is recommending that virtual machines be defragmented just as often as physical drives.

"The need for defragmentation is even more acute in virtual environments," stated a newly posted white paper co-authored by Osterman and disk management software vendor Diskeeper. "Physical hardware in a virtualized storage environment must support more operating systems and so can undergo even more disk access and more stress than in a non-virtualized environment."

[Read Computerworld Australia's storage virtualization buying guide]

Disk fragmentation occurs when data is continually written and rewritten to a disk, which can cause data to be scattered across different physical sectors of the physical drive when there is not enough contiguous space to write a file in one uninterrupted block. As a result, when a file is called, the disk must do more work recollecting the bits of the file from different locations, slowing performance.

Windows, as well as third-party software firms, offer defragmenters to reassemble fragmented files. Fragmentation is not as large of a problem on Unix systems, due to the way that the OS writes files to disk.

According to the paper, virtual disks can become just as fragmented as physical disks. For instance, a single file on a virtual disk may be split into four fragments, and the virtual disk itself may be split into another three fragments on the physical disk itself. The cumulative effect of fragmentation on both layers reduces system performance considerably.

"Disk I/O in one virtual machine has a cascading effect on disk I/O in other virtual machines, and so the problem of excessive disk I/O in virtual machines is, in fact, even worse than what would be experienced in a physical disk environment," the paper states.

Not surprisingly, Diskeeper offers virtual disk optimizer software, V-locity, which can prevent virtual machines from becoming too fragmented. But both Microsoft and VMware have recommended defragmentation in various support forums as well.

Joab Jackson covers enterprise software and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Follow Joab on Twitter at @Joab_Jackson. Joab's e-mail address is Joab_Jackson@idg.com

Tags application virtualizationOsterman ResearchConfiguration / maintenancemaintenanceDiskeeperhardware systemsStorage virtualizationsystem managementVMwarevirtualizationServer VirtualizationMicrosoftdesktop virtualizationsoftware

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Joab Jackson

IDG News Service

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?