Age discrimination suit against Google will go ahead

The Supreme Court of California upheld an appeals court ruling

A court case filed by a former Google employee alleging he was wrongfully fired due to his age will go to trial, the Supreme Court of California ruled Thursday.

The long running legal dispute with Google was raised by Brian Reid, of Palo Alto, California. Reid was 52 when he left his job as a professor at Carnegie Mellon University's California campus to join Google in 2002, and court documents show he alleges age discrimination as one reason Google fired him.

His original case against the company was filed in 2004.

According to court documents, Reid alleges he had been called a number of names by fellow workers, including "old man," "old fuddy duddy" and more. Remarks from a written performance review also indicate Google was satisfied with Reid in his first year at the company.

The original trial court ruled that Google had legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for firing Reid and issued a summary judgment, so the case did not actually go to trial. But an appeals court overruled, affirming the age discrimination argument, and said the case should see a trial.

The Supreme Court of California upheld the appeals court ruling for a number of reasons, but noted in particular certain emails regarding Reid passed between senior Google executives.

In his original complaint, Reid sought an undisclosed sum in damages, including a request to restore 119,000 options to buy Google stock at a strike price of $0.30, which were taken from him when he was fired.

Google has denied any wrongdoing and maintains that Reid was not laid off based on his age. "The Supreme Court today simply upheld the lower court's decision that the case should not be dismissed without a trial," Google said in a statement. "We look forward to demonstrating in court the legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons why Mr. Reid was let go," the company added..

(Nancy Gohring in Seattle contributed to this report)

Tags GooglelegalCivil lawsuits

Recommended

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Dan Nystedt

IDG News Service

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?