New iPhone App rules: Unreasonable and unjustifiable

Amidst all the hullabaloo surrounding the launch of Apple's iPhone OS 4.0, the contentious company from Cupertino is coming under fire for a quietly made change to its iPhone developer's agreement.

The change, first noted by John Gruber of the Daring Fireball blog, effectively prohibits developers from using any "intermediary translation" tools in building native iPhone applications. In simpler terms, programmers will be required to use only Apple's proprietary tools in creating their apps; they won't be able to translate their programs from other platforms as they'd previously been able to do.

In simpler terms yet, Apple's saying, "Do it our way, or don't do it at all," in an even more extreme fashion than it's ever said it before.

Apple's iPhone License and Adobe Flash

Apple's iPhone license change would cause numerous apps known to iPhone and iPad users to be outlawed. Among the highest profile victims are programs created with Adobe's Flash-to-iPhone compiler; some of the iPad-friendly magazine implementations we've been hearing about for months revolve around that technology.

So why is Apple revising its rules in such a restrictive way? There's no shortage of theories. Some say it's a bold new attack in Apple's ongoing battle against Adobe; others insist it's all part of Apple's mission to create the best possible user experience. Others yet believe it's part of Apple's effort to build a regime even more oppressive than China's.

(OK, that last one was a satirical suggestion. But let's be honest: It's not that far of a stretch.)

Apple iPhone Developer Backlash

Regardless of the reason, current iPhone developers are wasting no time in voicing their thoughts on Apple's shift. Joe Hewitt, who programmed the iPhone's Facebook application, lashed out against the updated developer's agreement on his Twitter stream.

"So much for programming language innovation on the iPhone platform," Hewitt wrote. "It's so hard to reconcile my love for these beautiful devices on my desk with my hatred for the ugly words in that legal agreement."

Developer Hank Williams, meanwhile, questions whether Apple's change will lead to a legal challenge.

"This concept of what language something is written in is an insidious concept and strikes at the core of product development and of computer science in general," Williams stated on his blog. "Trying to control where something is originally done is attempting to control the thought process that yields a given result."

Apple's Closed Culture: Some Perspective

As for me, I've expressed my thoughts on Apple's closed and restrictive culture plenty of times before. And I know the response from Apple's most loyal defenders tends to be that Apple does these things so it can maintain a smooth and seamless user experience.

Rather than rehashing what's already been said, then, let me pose this question: What if it had been Microsoft making this same move? Declaring that developers could write programs for Windows using only its proprietary toolkit? Prohibiting all noncompliant creations (including, yes, Apple's own iTunes) from running on its systems?

Taken out of the context of Cupertino, it's easy to see why Apple's actions are out of the realm of reason -- and, quite simply, out of line.

JR Raphael is a PCWorld contributing editor and the co-founder of eSarcasm. You can find him on Facebook:

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags iPhoneiphone apps

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

JR Raphael

PC World (US online)
Show Comments

Cool Tech

Crucial Ballistix Elite 32GB Kit (4 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 UDIMM

Learn more >

Gadgets & Things

Lexar® Professional 1000x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Family Friendly

Lexar® JumpDrive® S57 USB 3.0 flash drive 

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Plox Star Wars Death Star Levitating Bluetooth Speaker

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles


GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy


First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni


For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell


The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi


The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott


My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?