USB 3.0: The new speed limit

Faster data and more power

Have you spent too much time waiting for large files to crawl between a computer and an external hard drive? Don't fret -- USB 3.0 has arrived. Not only can it move data faster and provide more power, but it's compatible with USB 2.0 devices.

Developed by the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF), USB 3.0's SuperSpeed specification promises a theoretical top speed of 5Gbit/sec. versus USB 2.0's 480Mbit/sec.

The key to blending old and new is NEC's μPD720200 controller chip. It has the circuitry for USB 2.0 and 3.0 transfers inside and can use either, depending on what's plugged in. Right now, it's the only game in town, but look for other companies, including Symwave, Fujitsu and Via, to introduce their own USB 3.0 chips in the coming months.

The first round of USB 3.0 cards and devices works with Windows Vista and Windows 7; Apple hasn't decided whether to support the new standard. The basic software for USB 3.0 has been in the Linux kernel since last fall, and the needed drivers are slowly coming out.

There are already a few USB 3.0 devices available. To test them, I used a Lenovo ThinkPad W510 with USB 3.0 built in. I tried out a variety of new devices, including the Buffalo DriveStation USB 3.0 HD-HXU3 external hard drive; a StarTech SuperSpeed USB 3.0 to SATA Hard Drive Docking Station in combination with my current Western Digital WD Caviar Blue external drive; and a Seagate BlackArmor PS 110 USB 3.0 Performance Kit, a portable hard drive that includes its software on a USB 3.0 ExpressCard.

What's new in USB 3.0?

Unlike the change from USB 1.0 to USB 2.0, USB 3.0 brings actual physical differences to the connectors. The flat USB Type A plug (that goes into the computer) looks the same, but inside is an extra set of connectors; the edge of the plug is colored blue to indicate that it's USB 3.0.

On the other end of the cable, the Type B plug (that goes into the USB device) actually looks different -- it has an extra set of connectors, so it looks a bit like a USB plug that's been crimped a little ways down one end. There's also a new Micro Type B plug that has all its connectors laid out horizontally.

As a result, you won't be able to fit a USB 3.0 cable into a USB 2.0 device. However, you will be able to plug USB 3.0 devices -- and cables -- into your current computer; you just won't get the speed advantage. (Note: To get the most out of USB 3.0, the cable needs to be less than about 9 feet long, down from the USB 2.0 16-foot limit.)

The reason for the new connector is that the USB 3.0 cable contains nine wires (four more than a USB 2.0 cable); eight carry data and one is used as a ground. Despite the increase in wires, however, the cables should be no thicker than those used by USB 2.0. There will be a big difference in performance, however. USB 2.0 is like a single-lane country road that needs to handle the morning-commute traffic in and out of L.A. There are jams and slowdowns when too much data is going back and forth. With nine wires available, USB 3.0 has an additional two lanes of traffic in each direction to smooth the flow between the computer and the device.

Unlike USB 2.0, which requires synchronous transfers, where the data is asked for and then sent, the 3.0 host controller doesn't have to poll the USB device every time it wants to send data. This streamlines the flow with high-speed asynchronous transfers.

While SuperSpeed's peak speed is 5Gbit/sec., it will drop to a slower speed on occasion - for example, when it moves data into and out of older devices or when it's being used with a too-long cable.

On top of faster data speeds, USB 3.0 provides up to 150 milliamps (mA) of electricity - 50 per cent more than USB 2.0 - to an unconfigured device while the computer it's connected to is finding and loading its needed software. Once the device has been configured and accepted by the computer's operating system, USB 3.0 can deliver 900mA to the device, compared with USB 2.0's 500mA. This should be more than enough to power a hard drive or a camcorder -- or even a USB device (such as a monitor or a projector) that needs more power than is available via a USB 2.0 port.

USB 3.0 offers power conservation as well. While USB 2.0 is either on or off and wastes power when it isn't being used, the new spec comes with three levels of power use that draw progressively less power.

But be aware that first-generation USB 3.0 implementations are power-hungry. The Lenovo ThinkPad W510 that I used for testing ran for 2 hours 19 minutes while continuously playing music from a USB 3.0 external drive -- and ran for an additional 34 minutes when it used a USB 2.0 port.

How we tested

To gauge the abilities of the USB 3.0 spec, I connected each device to a Lenovo ThinkPad W510 that came with an Intel Core i7 processor, 8GB of RAM and a 500GB hard drive. It also has four USB ports: two USB 3.0, one USB 2.0 and one combo USB 2.0/eSATA.

Of course, the first round of USB 3.0 devices will be mostly working off of computers that still offer only USB 2.0 -- either using the 2.0 ports or using adapters that will, hopefully, bring the system up to USB 3.0 specs. I tested this by using a Fujitsu LifeBook A6220, which has a 2-GHz Core 2 Duo processor, 3GB of RAM, a 15.4-in. screen and four USB 2.0 ports. I connected each USB 3.0 device to its USB 2.0 port and then to each of two USB 3.0 ExpressCard controllers: the StarTech 2 Port ExpressCard SuperSpeed USB 3.0 Card Adapter ($50) and the USB 3.0 ExpressCard adapter that came with the Seagate BlackArmor drive.

To evaluate the speed of the three USB 3.0 devices, I used PassMark's DiskMark software, which is part of the PerformanceTest suite. The tests include:

  • Sequential Read: The software creates a large test file on the external drive, and the data is read sequentially from beginning to end by the system.
  • Disk Sequential Write: The software creates a large test file, and the data is sequentially written on the external hard drive.
  • Disk Random Seek RW: The software creates a large test file on the external drive, and the data is read randomly. After a seek is performed to move the file pointer to a random position in the file, a 16KB block is read or written on the drive. Then the test is repeated until all the data is transferred.
  • DiskMark: This weighted average score of the other tests gives a good indication of the drive's overall performance in real-world situations.

I also took an 8.45GB folder containing 1,450 files and timed how long it took to transfer them between the system and the drive. Between runs, I emptied the system's Recycle Bin.

To see if USB 2.0 devices work as promised with USB 3.0 hardware, I put together a group of 10 old and new USB 2.0 devices, including an optical drive, mouse, webcam, external hard drive, video camera, keyboard, speakers, SD card, USB key and media player. I plugged them into each of the three controllers, watched to see if they automatically connected and verified that they were working. All passed the test.

Finally, to see how the new hardware affects battery life, I played an uninterrupted stream of music from an external USB 3.0 hard drive on the ThinkPad W510 while using PassMark's BatteryMon to monitor how quickly the system's 9,500mAh battery drained. I did this using the drive with both USB 3.0 and 2.0 and compared the results.

Next: Product reviews

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags reviewsUSB 3.0Seagate BlackArmorBuffalo DriveStationstorageLenovo ThinkPad W510StarTech SuperSpeed

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Brian Nadel

Computerworld (US)

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?