AFACT, film studios lose iiNet case (updated)

Australian ISP iiNet has won a landmark Federal Court battle against the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT).

Australian ISP iiNet has won a landmark Federal Court battle against the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT).

AFACT, representing Roadshow Films, Channel 7 and other film studios including Universal Pictures, Warner Bros Entertainment, Paramount Pictures, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, and Disney Enterprises attempted to sue iiNet for failing to act against customers downloading illegal content over the Internet via BitTorrent and P2P file sharing networks.

[Check out a timeline of the AFACT vs. iiNet case]

In handing down his verdict, Justice Cowdroy said that though there was substantial evidence of users downloading pirated content, iiNet can't be seen as "approving infringement."

"I find the mere provision of access to the Internet is not the means of infringement. Rather, the means by which the applicant's copying is infringed is in iiNet users' use of the constituent parts of the BitTorrent system. iiNet has no control over the BitTorrent system and is not responsible for the operation of the BitTorrent system," ruled Justice Cowdroy.

"I find that iiNet simply cannot be seen as sanctioning, approving or countenancing copyright infringement," he continued.

In addition to ruling in favour of iiNet, Justice Cowdroy also ruled that AFACT pay iiNet all court costs.

In a media statement released following the verdict, iiNet welcomed the Federal Court’s judgment and stressed that it has "never supported, encouraged or authorised illegal sharing or downloading of files."

"We have never supported or encouraged breaches of the law, including infringement of the Copy Right Act of the Telecommunications Act. Today’s judgment is a vindication of that and the allegations against us have been proven to be unfounded," said the statement. "We do not and never have supported, encouraged or authorised illegal sharing or downloading of files in breach of the copyright laws. We are eager to engage with the film industry and copyright holders to make this material legitimately available."

The film studios represented by AFACT also released a statement expressing disappointment on the verdict. "Today’s decision is a set back for the 50,000 Australians employed in the film industry," said AFACT director Neil Gane. "But we believe this decision was based on a technical finding centred on the court’s interpretation of the how infringement’s occur and the ISPs ability to control them. We are confident that the Government does not intend a policy outcome where rampant copyright infringement is allowed to continue unaddressed and unabated via the iiNet network." "We will now take the time to review the decision before making further comment on next steps."

It is not yet known whether AFACT will appeal the decision.

Stay up to date with the latest news, reviews and features. Sign up to PC World’s newsletters

Follow PC World Australia on Twitter: @PCWorldAu

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags bittorrentAFACT v iiNetiiNet

Struggling for Christmas presents this year? Check out our Christmas Gift Guide for some top tech suggestions and more.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.
Ross Catanzariti

Ross Catanzariti

PC World

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?