Study: Click fraud rate relatively low in 2009's Q4

The 15.3 percent click fraud rate represents a big improvement over the fourth quarter of 2008

Click fraud, a practice that dilutes the efficacy of pay-per-click (PPC) advertising campaigns run in search engines like Google, stayed relatively low in the fourth quarter, according to a study.

Click Forensics, a provider of click-fraud detection services and products, said on Tuesday that the industry's average click-fraud rate for the quarter ending Dec. 31 was 15.3 percent.

Although that is up from the 14.1 percent rate in the third quarter, it also represents a significant drop from 2008's fourth quarter, when the click-fraud rate hit an all-time high of 17.1 percent.

Click Forensics credited search engines, Web publishers and ad networks with doing a better job of detecting click fraud in the commerce-heavy holiday season.

Click fraud happens when PPC ads are clicked on by mistake or for malicious reasons. Every time their PPC ads are clicked on, advertisers pay ad networks a fee. PPC ads are linked to advertisers' Web pages.

In malicious click fraud, publishers that display those PPC ads click on them to increase the commission they split with the ad networks. Another common instance of malicious click fraud is when companies click on their competitors' ads to drive up their ad spending with clicks that won't result in any business.

Non-malicious click fraud occurs when people click on PPC ads by mistake when they have no interest in the product or service advertised.

Click Forensics has been issuing a quarterly click-fraud industry report since 2006 by collecting data from PPC campaigns in search engines, comparison shopping engines and social networks, and monitoring traffic from more than 300 ad networks.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Juan Carlos Perez

IDG News Service
Topics: advertising, Click Forensics, click fraud, online advertising
Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Compare & Save

Deals powered by WhistleOut
WhistleOut

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?