US agencies streamline broadband funding process

Two agencies cut a third funding round from broadband grant and loan programs

Two U.S. agencies responsible for distributing US$7.2 billion in broadband deployment grants by the end of 2010 have streamlined the process by cutting one of three rounds of funding.

The U.S. Rural Utilities Service (RUS) and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) plan to announce a second and final funding round in early 2010, the agencies said.

The two agencies issued a request for information (RFI) Tuesday, asking for feedback on the broadband deployment programs offered by each agency. The RFI seeks input on ways to streamline the application process, and it asks whether the agencies can better balance the public’s interest in transparency and openness with broadband providers' interest in maintaining the confidentiality of proprietary data.

In the first round of funding, for about $4 billion in grants and loans, the two agencies received 2,200 applications for about $28 billion in funding. The agencies expect to award the first-round funding in December.

With the "overwhelming response," a consolidated final round makes sense, Lawrence Strickling, NTIA's administrator, said in a statement.

The consolidated second round will get the money out faster in an effort to help the U.S. economy, the agencies said. The broadband programs are part of a $787 billion economic stimulus package passed by Congress early this year.

The consolidated approach "gives applicants and communities a greater opportunity to come together to form networks and find more creative ways to connect to the global economy through broadband,” Jonathan Adelstein, RUS administrator, said in a statement. “We are listening to applicants, reviewing applications received, and all indications suggest a need to revisit the application process. We will consider changes ... to make the process more applicant friendly from beginning to end.”

Craig Settles, a community broadband consultant and president of Successful.com, said it makes sense for the agencies to cut one funding round.

"If you look at the level to which the first round was over-subscribed, applicants collectively asking for seven times the $4 billion of funds available, it makes no sense to try to do two funding rounds for smaller amounts when there's this kind of demand," he said. "Also, the administrative burden of preparing for, receiving and reviewing these applications is huge. Both agencies probably cut their admin time in half by consolidating the last two rounds."

The RFI, with the agencies seeking comments on the process, came as a pleasant surprise, Settles added. The original rules did not allow for proposals from local governments and public-private partnerships, he said, and the RFI acknowledges those complaints.

The RFI also is asking for people to comment on definitions of "remote" and "unserved" areas eligible for special funding, he noted. "The RFI even asks if the agencies should adjust their focus to address proposals with a clear economic development impact," Settles said. "This is significant because it goes beyond just trying to accomplish a goal of getting people online, and gets to the heart of the [stimulus package's] primary goal -- turning the economy around."

Tags NTIARFIRUSbroadband

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Grant Gross

IDG News Service

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?