Pirate Bay appeals postponed until next year

The question of bias forces a court to postpone the trial indefinitely

The appeals of those convicted in April in the high-profile Pirate Bay copyright violations trial won't be heard until next year, the court said on Monday.

The delay is due to allegations of bias directed at two of the judges, Ulrika Ihrfelt and Katarina Boutz , which must be resolved before the appeal can take place. This won't happen until next year, according to Ihrfelt.

The appeal was originally scheduled to start on Nov. 13.

The judges were found to be unbiased by the Svea Court of Appeals, it announced on Oct. 6, but now the Supreme Court must confirm that ruling. Their involvement in pro-copyright organizations are the basis of the bias allegations.

Accusations of bias have been a recurring theme in The Pirate Bay case.

In September, one of the lay judges scheduled to hear the appeal was deemed biased by the Svea Court of Appeals because of his involvement in the streaming music service Spotify.

Also, the Court of Appeals has found that District Court Judge Tomas Norström was not biased when he delivered the guilty verdict against the four people involved in running the file-sharing site.

Norström was also accused of being biased because of his involvement with pro-copyright organizations.

In April, Fredrik Neij , Gottfrid Svartholm Warg , Peter Sunde and Carl Lundström were found guilty of being accessories to crimes against copyright law, and each sentenced to one year in prison.

The court also ordered them to pay around 30 million Swedish kronor (US$4.3 million) in damages. All four defendants appealed the verdicts.

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags the pirate baycopyrightlegallawsuitsP2Pfile sharing

Struggling for Christmas presents this year? Check out our Christmas Gift Guide for some top tech suggestions and more.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Mikael Ricknäs

IDG News Service

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?