AFACT 'goes for the throat' in iiNet case

The copyright industry body withdraws another claim against iiNet close to trial date in a bid to boost its main case

The Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) has dropped another legal claim against iiNet six days before its Federal Court trial in a bid to bolster its main case.

The legal brawl over copyright infringement was instigated by AFACT against iiNet in November. Representing a host of movie studios, AFACT accused the ISP of violating copyright laws by allowing subscribers to download films through BitTorrent and peer-to-peer (P2P).

In AFACT’s Outline of Submissions tendered to the Court earlier this month, the industry group omitted a former claim which alleged iiNet made copies of and stored pirated movies. That aspect of the case asserted the ISP cached the illegal content as it passed through its network when users were downloading movies. AFACT subsequently conceded to the Court that it has withdrawn that claim.

This marks the second time the industry representative has dropped a portion of its case. In May, AFACT disposed of a legal claim known as ‘conversion’, which suggested iiNet denied copyright holders their right over possession.

AFACT stressed it is trying to pool more resources behind the main part of the case by shedding the peripheral components.

“The authorisation part of the case, which says iiNet failed to prevent online copyright theft of customers, has always been the main part of the case,” an AFACT spokesperson told ARN. “The cache and conversion claims were always subsidiary."

In response, an iiNet spokesperson vented his frustration at the industry group’s penchant for dropping bits of the case and its shallow comprehension of the Internet industry.

“It’s a frustrating and annoying thing that they would make these mischievous claims and withdraw them at the last second,” he said. “We didn’t think they had any evidence to support that claim and it has turned out that we were right.

“They clearly don’t seem to understand how the Internet works and for AFACT to make that claim in the first place shows its ignorance over the technology.”

AFACT defended its late decision, highlighting iiNet’s own shortcomings in timely submittal of evidence.

“iiNet is still filing evidence before the Court and there are documents we are still receiving as close as yesterday and today,” the AFACT spokesperson said. “In terms of cutting it fine, it’s a tight timetable and as evidence comes to light, decisions are being made close to the hearing date. But you certainly can’t draw any conclusions on that.”

The trial commences on October 6.

Tags AFACTcopyrightiiNet

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?