Wikipedia drops GNU in favor of Creative Commons license

The change is expected to simplify and increase re-use of Wikipedia content

The Wikimedia Foundation will change the terms under which it licenses the content in Wikipedia, the organization said Thursday.

By adopting the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA), Wikimedia expects to make it easier for others to re-use the content on Wikipedia and its other sites.

The decision was approved by Wikimedia's Board of Trustees. Previously, Wikimedia had held a vote in which 88 percent of about 17,000 of its members favored the change.

The current license, the GNU Free Documentation License (FDL), will continue to be supported in certain cases, but all Wikimedia sites, including Wikipedia, will make the CC-BY-SA license their primary one for content.

Wikimedia allows the content on its Web sites to be used "for any purpose," with the condition that users give proper credit and make their modifications available under the same terms, the organization said in a statement.

By embracing CC-BY-SA, Wikimedia will make its content "legally compatible" with content elsewhere that is also governed by this license and thus easier to re-use by others.

When Wikipedia was founded in 2001, the Creative Commons licenses didn't exist, so it adopted the GNU Free Documentation License -- created for software documentation by the Free Software Foundation -- because it allowed for content re-use and re-distribution.

However, the Creative Commons licenses have been widely adopted since their creation in 2002.

In addition to resolving legal incompatibilities, adopting the CC-BY-SA will allow Wikimedia to drop the GNU FDL's requirement to include a copy of the license text with each copy, which Wikimedia finds complicates the process of re-using and remixing its sites' content.

Tags gnulicensingopensourcecreative commonswikipedia

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Juan Carlos Perez

IDG News Service

1 Comment

EffereBople

1

BLNMMMDKGXTND http://www.concordance-newtestament.com XRLDCUINEYSUF http://www.danielcraig007lookalike.com IEKYGHOSBQGKS

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest News Articles

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?