Study: Viagra spam is profitable, but margins are tight

Spam sent by the Storm network could be generating up to $3.5 million per year in revenue a year for pharmaceutical product sales.

One of the most notorious networks of hacked computers used for sending spam could be generating as much as US$3.5 million per year peddling drugs such as Viagra, according to new research.

While filters used by e-mail providers Yahoo, Google and Microsoft halt a vast amount of spam, messages squeak through and reach receptive buyers.

The study was carried out by infiltrating the Storm botnet, a robust peer-to-peer system that commands millions of hacked computers to send spam campaigns.

The researchers modified Storm's command-and-control system to insert their own links in spam messages that lead to Web sites they created instead of the one's spammers were advertising.

One of the Web sites advertised pharmaceuticals, and the other mimicked an e-postcard site. E-postcard spam often leads to Web sites that try to infect PCs with malicious software that causes the machines to send Storm-related spam.

Both sites the researchers created were harmless: The drug site would return an error if someone tried to buy something, and the e-postcards site contained a benign executable. The sites reported attempted purchases and whether the executable ran.

The researchers monitored how many messages reached inboxes and whether the messages lead to a purchase or infected a PC with malware.

Over the course of the spam campaigns, some 469 million e-mails were sent. Of the 350 million pharmaceutical messages, 10,522 users visited the site, but only 28 people tried to make a purchase, a response rate of .0000081 percent.

"However, a very low conversion rate does not necessarily imply low revenue or profitability," the researchers wrote.

The average purchase price was $100. Calculating how much pharmaceutical spam Storm sends out daily, revenue could top US$7,000 per day. Per year, revenue would hit US$3.5 million.

"This number could be even higher if spam-advertised pharmacies experience repeat business," they wrote.

Still, sending spam is expensive. It would cost upwards of US$25,000 to send 350 million messages, which is too much to likely make a profit on the conversion rate observed.

The researchers said it suggests a business model where those running the Storm botnet are also involved in running the drug Web sites.

"If true, the hypothesis is heartening," they wrote. "It suggests that the third-party retail market for spam distribution has not grown large or efficient enough to produce competitive pricing."

The upshot is that spammers and Storm network operators may be working on tight margins in order to make a profit, and their campaigns are "economically susceptible to new defenses," the study said.

The response rate to spam luring people to e-postcard sites was higher. The researchers estimated that a Storm self-propagation campaign, which seeks to infect new PCs to maintain the network, could result in 3,500 to 8,500 new bots per day.

The research was done by the computer science departments of the University of California at its Berkeley and San Diego campuses.

Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags storm wormspam

Struggling for Christmas presents this year? Check out our Christmas Gift Guide for some top tech suggestions and more.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Jeremy Kirk

IDG News Service

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?