New FireWire spec is good to go, go go

FireWire S1600 and S3200 formats approved

Recently the 1394 Trade Association approved the FireWire S1600 and S3200 formats, with the final spec to be published in October. It's out of the gate first, but not by that large a margin: Intel's USB 3.0 spec is expected to be released by the end of the year. FireWire S1600 and S3200 will be backward-compatible with the current FireWire 400 and 800 formats.

FireWire has generally been the Betamax of plug-and-play port formats. It's technically a better format in terms of power efficiency and capabilities, and each generation has seen FireWire with a transfer-speed advantage over its USB counterpart. (That may not be the case this time: the new formats' theoretical throughputs will top out at 1.6 and 3.2 gigabits per second, compared to USB 3.0's target of 4.8 Gb/s.)

Also like the Betamax, FireWire is the stubborn second-place format that simply won't die, and that its proponents -- many of them video wonks -- staunchly defend. (I've particularly appreciated FireWire's lower CPU requirements, which has let me capture camcorder footage on older machines quite easily.)

Unlike Beta, however, FireWire is still easy to come by. When I was recently researching motherboards for my new custom Windows machine, I noticed that there many motherboards -- including those made by Intel -- with FireWire headers for those who wanted to spend a few extra dollars to get a port or two on their machine. There are far more USB devices, but those who need FireWire aren't hurting.

I always appreciate it when niche formats can coexist without a huge technical or financial hit, and more so when they keep reasonably current. With plans for even more advanced specs on the horizon, it appears that FireWire fans don't have much to worry about.

Recommended

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Emru Townsend

PC World (US online)

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?